ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2020
HINT: A hierarchical independent component analysis toolbox for investigating brain functional networks using neuroimaging data.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A general framework for investigating neurodevelopment of brain functional networks using multisite and longitudinal neuroimaging.The annals of applied statistics · 2026Article
- Article
- Sparse Bayesian modeling of hierarchical independent component analysis: Reliable estimation of individual differences in brain networks.Biometrics · 2023Article
- LOCUS: A REGULARIZED BLIND SOURCE SEPARATION METHOD WITH LOW-RANK STRUCTURE FOR INVESTIGATING BRAIN CONNECTIVITY.The annals of applied statistics · 2023Article
- A hierarchical independent component analysis model for longitudinal neuroimaging studies.NeuroImage · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndependent component analysis (ICA) is a popular tool for investigating brain organization in neuroscience research. In fMRI studies, an important goal is to study how brain networks are modulated by subjects' clinical and demographic variables. Existing ICA methods and toolboxes don't incorporate subjects' covariates effects in ICA estimation of brain networks, which potentially leads to loss in accuracy and statistical power in detecting brain network differences between subjects' groups. NEW
methodWe introduce a Matlab toolbox, HINT (Hierarchical INdependent component analysis Toolbox), that provides a hierarchical covariate-adjusted ICA (hc-ICA) for modeling and testing covariate effects and generates model-based estimates of brain networks on both the population- and individual-level. HINT provides a user-friendly Matlab GUI that allows users to easily load images, specify covariate effects, monitor model estimation via an EM algorithm, specify hypothesis tests, and visualize results. HINT also has a command line interface which allows users to conveniently run and reproduce the analysis with a script. COMPARISON TO EXISTING
methodsHINT implements a new multi-level probabilistic ICA model for group ICA. It provides a statistically principled ICA modeling framework for investigating covariate effects on brain networks. HINT can also generate and visualize model-based network estimates for user-specified subject groups, which greatly facilitates group comparisons.
resultsWe demonstrate the steps and functionality of HINT with an fMRI example data to estimate treatment effects on brain networks while controlling for other covariates. Results demonstrate estimated brain networks and model-based comparisons between the treatment and control groups. In comparisons using synthetic fMRI data, HINT shows desirable statistical power in detecting group differences in networks especially in small sample sizes, while maintaining a low false positive rate. HINT also demonstrates similar or increased accuracy in reconstructing both population- and individual-level source signal maps as compared to some state-of-the-art group ICA methods.
conclusionHINT can provide a useful tool for both statistical and neuroscience researchers to evaluate and test differences in brain networks between subject groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.