Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32360431›Full record

ArticleThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Joint report of SBI (Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases), FEBRASGO (Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations), SBU (Brazilian Society of Urology) and SBPC/ML (Brazilian Society of Clinical Pathology/Laboratory Medicine): recommendations for the clinical management of lower urinary tract infections in pregnant and non-pregnant women.

Patricia de Rossi, Sergio Cimerman, José Carlos Truzzi, Clóvis Arns da Cunha, Rosiane Mattar, Marinês Dalla Valle Martino, Maurício Hachul, Adagmar Andriolo, José Ananias Vasconcelos Neto, João Antônio Pereira-Correia and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Characterization of UropathogenicMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Infection Prophylaxis in Urological Diagnostic and Surgical Procedures - A narrative review and recommendations.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia de RossiConjunto Hospitalar do Mandaqui and Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: patriciatuti1@gmail.com.
Sergio CimermanInstituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
José Carlos TruzziUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) and Instituto do Câncer Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho (IAVC), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Clóvis Arns da CunhaUniversidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Rosiane MattarUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Departamento de Obstetrícia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marinês Dalla Valle MartinoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo and Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (HIAE), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maurício HachulSociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Adagmar AndrioloUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
José Ananias Vasconcelos NetoUniversidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), Ceará, CE, Brazil.
João Antônio Pereira-CorreiaServiço de Urologia do Hospital dos Servidores do Estado do Rio de Janeiro and Departamento de Urologia Feminina da Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Antonia M O MachadoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Hospital São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana Cristina GalesUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Departamento de Medicina, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRHospital de Base · BRHospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado · BRHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRHospital São Paulo · BRInstituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas · BRSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common condition in women. There is an increased concern on reduction of bacterial susceptibility resulting from wrongly prescribing antimicrobials. This paper summarizes the recommendations of four Brazilian medical societies (SBI - Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases, FEBRASGO - Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations, SBU - Brazilian Society of Urology, and SBPC/ML - Brazilian Society of Clinical Pathology/Laboratory Medicine) on the management of urinary tract infection in women. Asymptomatic bacteriuria should be screened at least twice during pregnancy (early and in the 3rd trimester). All cases of significant bacteriuria (≥10

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, MedicalAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobialsAsymptomatic bacteriuriaCystitisPregnancyRecurrentUrinary tract infectionWomen

Identifiers

PMID32360431
PMCPMC9392033
OpenAlexW3021636074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.