Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32360037›Full record

ReviewL'Encephale2020

[Challenges for psychotropics in the context of the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic].

H Javelot, P-M Llorca, G Meyer, P Fossati, E Haffen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in L'Encephale, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

H JavelotÉtablissement Public de Santé Alsace Nord, Brumath, France; Laboratoire de Toxicologie et Pharmacologie Neuro Cardiovasculaire, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: herve.javelot@ch-epsan.fr.
P-M LlorcaCHU Clermont-Ferrand, EA 7280, Université Clermont Auvergne, France.
G MeyerService Pharmacie, Établissement Public de Santé Alsace Nord, Brumath, France; Service Pharmacie, CHU de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
P FossatiService de psychiatrie adultes, APHP, Sorbonne université, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpêtrière, ICM, Inserm U1127, Paris, France.
E HaffenService de psychiatrie, CIC-1431 Inserm, CHU de Besançon, Laboratoire de Neurosciences, Université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

French recommendations have been proposed for psychotropics use and possible adaptations during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Between uncertainties linked to the lack of data and speculations about possible benefits of psychotropics against the coronavirus, we propose here elements allowing to base the pharmacotherapeutic decisions potentially useful in Covid+ patients with psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusDrug RepositioningPandemicsAnti-Anxiety AgentsAntiviral AgentsComorbidityCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDyspneaHumansHypnotics and SedativesMental DisordersPneumonia, ViralPsychotropic DrugsRespirationAnti-Anxiety AgentsAntiviral AgentsHypnotics and SedativesPsychotropic DrugsCOVID-19PsychotropesPsychotropicsRecommandationsRecommendationsSARS-Cov-2

Identifiers

PMID32360037
PMCPMC7177137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.