Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32359936›Full record

Observational studyJournal of optometry

Comparison of nanoemulsion and non-emollient artificial tears on tear lipid layer thickness and symptoms.

Kimberly Weisenberger, Nick Fogt, Jennifer Swingle Fogt

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of optometry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of HP-Guar Nano-emulsion Artificial Tears on Symptoms and Severity of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Evaporative Dry Eye During a 90-Day Longitudinal Study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kimberly WeisenbergerOhio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: Weisenberger.39@osu.edu.
Nick FogtOhio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jennifer Swingle FogtOhio State University College of Optometry, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDry eye disease (DED) is often managed with over-the-counter eye drops. This study evaluated the diurnal effects of a single drop of two ocular lubricants (nanoemulsion vs. non-emollient) on tear film lipid layer thickness (LLT) and symptoms of ocular dryness. Subjects were also assessed after 1 month of nanoemulsion eye drop use.

methodsPart 1 was a cross-over comparison of a nanoemulsion and a non-emollient eye drop. LLT and dry eye symptoms were measured at baseline and at 15min, 1h, 2h, 4h and 6h after instillation of each drop. Part 2 was a 1-month observational study assessing LLT and symptoms after 30-day use of the nanoemulsion drop four times daily (qid).

resultsTotal of 20 subjects completed the study (mean age=45.6±7.9, 15 female). Part 1 found a significant increase in average LLT 15min after nanoemulsion drop instillation in the overall and inferior third of the tear film for subjects with baseline LLT values <50nm. Average LLT values did not increase after use of the non-emollient. Symptoms of dryness improved up to 6h following instillation of both drops. Part 2 results found that using the nanoemulsion eye drop for 1 month improved symptoms reported on symptom surveys.

conclusionNanoemulsion eye drop use increased average LLT in subjects with low baseline levels. Statistically and clinically significant improvement in symptoms were found on symptom surveys after qid-use (four times a day) of the nanoemulsion drop. Results suggest that a nanoemulsion eye drop can benefit subjects with dry eye symptoms.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesLubricant Eye DropsAdultEyeFemaleHumansLipidsMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsTearsLipidsLubricant Eye DropsOphthalmic SolutionsArtificial tearsDry eye diseaseEye dropsGotas oftálmicasGrosor de la capa lipídicaLágrimas artificialesLipid layer thicknessSíndrome del ojo seco

Identifiers

PMID32359936
PMCPMC7752989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.