Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32359891›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2020

What the salamander eye has been telling the vision scientist's brain.

Fernando Rozenblit, Tim Gollisch

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. ATP-mediated increase in HJournal of neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Now that We Got There, What Next?Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando RozenblitDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37073, Göttingen, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Tim GollischDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37073, Göttingen, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen, 37077, Göttingen, Germany. Electronic address: tim.gollisch@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Göttingen · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salamanders have been habitual residents of research laboratories for more than a century, and their history in science is tightly interwoven with vision research. Nevertheless, many vision scientists - even those working with salamanders - may be unaware of how much our knowledge about vision, and particularly the retina, has been shaped by studying salamanders. In this review, we take a tour through the salamander history in vision science, highlighting the main contributions of salamanders to our understanding of the vertebrate retina. We further point out specificities of the salamander visual system and discuss the perspectives of this animal system for future vision research.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCaudataHumansRetinaAmbystomaAxolotlMudpuppyRetinaSalamanderVision

Identifiers

PMID32359891
PMCPMC7493835
OpenAlexW3012331480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.