Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32359583›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Use of reactive oxygen species (ozone, hydrogen peroxide) for disinfection of hatching eggs.

Lukasz Wlazlo, Kamil Drabik, Karrar I A Al-Shammari, Justyna Batkowska, Bozena Nowakowicz-Debek, Magdalena Gryzińska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukasz WlazloDepartment of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Hazards, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Kamil DrabikInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Karrar I A Al-ShammariDepartment of Animal Production Techniques, Al-Musaib Technical College, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Babylon, Iraq.
Justyna BatkowskaInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland. Electronic address: justyna.batkowska@up.lublin.pl.
Bozena Nowakowicz-DebekDepartment of Animal Hygiene and Environmental Hazards, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Magdalena GryzińskaInstitute of Biological Basis of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sample consisted of 480 hatching eggs of Japanese quails and was divided into 4 groups. Before the transfer to the incubator, the first group was not disinfected (negative control). In the second group, eggs were disinfected by means of formaldehyde fumigation (positive control). In the third and fourth group, reactive oxygen forms were used for disinfection- perhydrol (H

Indexed as

CoturnixAnimal HusbandryAnimalsDisinfectantsDisinfectionHydrogen PeroxideOvumOzonePoultry DiseasesReactive Oxygen SpeciesDisinfectantsHydrogen PeroxideOzoneReactive Oxygen Speciesdisinfectionhatching egghydrogen peroxideozone

Identifiers

PMID32359583
PMCPMC7597390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.