Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32359580›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Research Note: Effect of synbiotic supplementation on caecal Clostridium perfringens load in broiler chickens with different necrotic enteritis challenge models.

R Shanmugasundaram, A Markazi, M Mortada, T T Ng, T J Applegate, L R Bielke, B Syed, C M Pender, S Curry, G R Murugesan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cell-Free Culture Supernatant ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Transcriptomic Response ofFrontiers in fungal biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R ShanmugasundaramDepartment of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691, USA; Department of Poultry Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.
A MarkaziDepartment of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691, USA.
M MortadaDepartment of Poultry Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.
T T NgDepartment of Poultry Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.
T J ApplegateDepartment of Poultry Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.
L R BielkeDepartment of Animal Sciences, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster 44691, USA.
B SyedBIOMIN Holding GmbH, Getzersdorf 3131, Austria.
C M PenderBIOMIN America Inc., Overland Park 66210, KS, USA.
S CurryBIOMIN America Inc., Overland Park 66210, KS, USA.
G R MurugesanBIOMIN America Inc., Overland Park 66210, KS, USA.
R K SelvarajDepartment of Poultry Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA. Electronic address: selvaraj@uga.edu.
University of Georgia · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies were conducted to determine the efficacy of synbiotic applications to combat the negative effects of necrotic enteritis (NE). An in vitro study was conducted to test the effect of probiotics species supernatants to decrease Clostridium perfringens (CP) proliferation. Lactobacillus reuteri, Enterococcus faecium, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Pediococcus acidilactici culture supernatants decreased the proliferation of CP at 1:1 supernatant-to-pathogen dilution in vitro. Two in vivo studies were conducted to determine the in vivo response of synbiotic supplementation containing the aforementioned probiotic strains on broiler production performance and caecal CP load in broilers induced with NE infection. In experiment 1, 75 broiler chicks were randomly allotted to 3 treatment groups, control (basal diet), ionophore (Salinomycin), and synbiotic (PoultryStar me), from day of hatch, and NE was induced in all birds. There were no significant treatment effects on BW, feed consumption, and feed gain ratio. However, at 35 D, ionophore or synbiotic supplementation increased (P < 0.05) villi height and decreased interleukin (IL)-1 mRNA abundance, while synbiotic supplementation increased (P < 0.05) IL-10 mRNA abundance compared with the control group, respectively. In experiment 2, 360 broiler chicks were randomly allotted to 3 treatments, an unchallenged negative control (control; basal diet), challenged positive control (NE; basal diet), or NE + synbiotic group (synbiotic). At both 21 and 42 D of age, NE birds had decreased (P < 0.05) BW, feed conversion, and jejunal villi height compared with control, while NE + synbiotic birds were not different from control groups. At 42 D of age, NE birds had 2.2 log/g increased CP in the ceca contents compared with control, while synbiotic birds had CP load that was not different than that of the control group. NE + synbiotic birds had significantly greater amounts of bile anti-CP IgA than the control and NE groups. It can be concluded that synbiotic supplementation decreased CP proliferation in vitro and caecal CP load in vivo while improving production parameters during an NE infection in broilers.

Indexed as

Bacterial LoadChickensAnimal FeedAnimalsCecumClostridium InfectionsClostridium perfringensDietDietary SupplementsDose-Response Relationship, DrugPoultry DiseasesRandom AllocationSynbioticsclostridium perfringensEimeria maximaprobioticSalinomycinsynbiotic

Identifiers

PMID32359580
PMCPMC7597401
OpenAlexW3010710847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.