Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32359460›Full record

ReviewLancet (London, England)2020

A call for grounding implicit bias training in clinical and translational frameworks.

Nao Hagiwara, Frederick W Kron, Mark W Scerbo, Ginger S Watson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet (London, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Perceived Discrimination in Health Care Settings: Analysis of In-Depth Interviews of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The power of junior faculty mentoring committees.Journal of cellular physiology · 2024
    Review
  20. Intergroup time bias and aversive racism in the medical context.Journal of personality and social psychology · 2024
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nao HagiwaraDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: nhagiwara@vcu.edu.
Frederick W KronDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mark W ScerboDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Ginger S WatsonCurry School of Education and Human Development, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

Unveiling the role of physician implicit bias and communication behaviors in dissatisfaction, mistrust, and nonadherence in Black patients with Type 2 diabetesR01DK112009 · NIDDK · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HAGIWARA, NAO · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK112009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelAffectAttitude of Health PersonnelBiasCognitionFaculty, MedicalHealthcare DisparitiesHealth PersonnelHumansPrejudiceSocial DiscriminationStereotypingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32359460
PMCPMC7265967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.