Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2020
Comparison of ED95 of Butorphanol and Sufentanil for gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Alfentanil-Propofol Versus Sufentanil-Propofol Sedation on Postoperative Fatigue After Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Control Trial.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Trial
- Combined sedation in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging: determination of median effective dose of intranasal dexmedetomidine combined with oral midazolam.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Trial
- Effect of butorphanol on visceral pain in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Trial
- Efficacy and safety of propofol target-controlled infusion combined with butorphanol for sedated colonoscopy.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Trial
- Anesthetic effect of different doses of butorphanol in patients undergoing gastroscopy and colonoscopy.BMC surgery · 2021Trial
- The 90% effective dose of remimazolam in combination with sufentanil for sedation in patients undergoing gastroscopy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Esketamine vs Sufentanil with Propofol for Sedation in EUS: A Randomized, Controlled Study.Journal of pain research · 2025Article
- The effective dose of butorphanol tartrate in patients of different ages undergoing painless gastroscopy.The Journal of international medical research · 2024Article
- Review
- EDFrontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The median effective dose of propofol combined with butorphanol during artificial abortion: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Determination of the 95% effective dose of remimazolam tosylate in anesthesia induction inhibits endotracheal intubation response in senile patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Predominant role of gut-vagus-brain neuronal pathway in postoperative nausea and vomiting: evidence from an observational cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundButorphanol, a synthetic opioid partial agonist analgesic, has been widely used to control perioperative pain. However, the ideal dose and availability of butorphanol for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy are not well known. The aim of this study was to evaluated the 95% effective dose (ED
methodsThe study was divided into two parts. For the first part, voluntary patients who needed GI endoscopy anesthesia were recruited to measure the ED
resultsThe ED
conclusionsButorphanol at 9.07 μg/kg was more effective than sufentanil for GI endoscopy sedation and notably reduced the recovery time.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trail Registry (Registration number # ChiCTR1900022780; Date of Registration on April 25rd, 2019).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.