Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32359157›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2021

Phylogenomics Reveals Ancient Gene Tree Discordance in the Amphibian Tree of Life.

Paul M Hime, Alan R Lemmon, Emily C Moriarty Lemmon, Elizabeth Prendini, Jeremy M Brown, Robert C Thomson, Justin D Kratovil, Brice P Noonan, R Alexander Pyron, Pedro L V Peloso and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Loss, persistence and reversal of phenotypic traits.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Distortion of Jawed Vertebrate Phylogeny.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Distinct latitudinal patterns of molecular rates across vertebrates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Paul M HimeBiodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Alan R LemmonDepartment of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Emily C Moriarty LemmonDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
Elizabeth PrendiniDivision of Vertebrate Zoology: Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.
Jeremy M BrownDepartment of Biological Sciences and Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Robert C ThomsonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.
Justin D KratovilDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Brice P NoonanDepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA.
R Alexander PyronDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Pedro L V PelosoDivision of Vertebrate Zoology: Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.
Michelle L KortynaDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.
J Scott KeoghDivision of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, 2601, Australia.
Stephen C DonnellanSouth Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
Rachel Lockridge MuellerDepartment of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Christopher J RaxworthyDivision of Vertebrate Zoology: Herpetology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA.
Krushnamegh KunteNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru 560065, India.
Santiago R RonMuseo de Zoología, Escuela de Biología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador.
Sandeep DasForest Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation Division, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala 680653, India.
Nikhil GaitondeNational Centre for Biological Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bengaluru 560065, India.
David M GreenRedpath Museum, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C4, Canada.
Jim LabiskoThe Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, The University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, UK.
Jing CheState Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Kunming 650223, China.
David W WeisrockDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular phylogenies have yielded strong support for many parts of the amphibian Tree of Life, but poor support for the resolution of deeper nodes, including relationships among families and orders. To clarify these relationships, we provide a phylogenomic perspective on amphibian relationships by developing a taxon-specific Anchored Hybrid Enrichment protocol targeting hundreds of conserved exons which are effective across the class. After obtaining data from 220 loci for 286 species (representing 94% of the families and 44% of the genera), we estimate a phylogeny for extant amphibians and identify gene tree-species tree conflict across the deepest branches of the amphibian phylogeny. We perform locus-by-locus genealogical interrogation of alternative topological hypotheses for amphibian monophyly, focusing on interordinal relationships. We find that phylogenetic signal deep in the amphibian phylogeny varies greatly across loci in a manner that is consistent with incomplete lineage sorting in the ancestral lineage of extant amphibians. Our results overwhelmingly support amphibian monophyly and a sister relationship between frogs and salamanders, consistent with the Batrachia hypothesis. Species tree analyses converge on a small set of topological hypotheses for the relationships among extant amphibian families. These results clarify several contentious portions of the amphibian Tree of Life, which in conjunction with a set of vetted fossil calibrations, support a surprisingly younger timescale for crown and ordinal amphibian diversification than previously reported. More broadly, our study provides insight into the sources, magnitudes, and heterogeneity of support across loci in phylogenomic data sets.[AIC; Amphibia; Batrachia; Phylogeny; gene tree-species tree discordance; genomics; information theory.].

Indexed as

FossilsGenomicsAnimalsAnuraHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID32359157
PMCPMC7823230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.