Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32359154›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2020

Model-Based Detection of Whole-Genome Duplications in a Phylogeny.

Arthur Zwaenepoel, Yves Van de Peer

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arthur ZwaenepoelDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Yves Van de PeerDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

European Research Council 833522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancient whole-genome duplications (WGDs) leave signatures in comparative genomic data sets that can be harnessed to detect these events of presumed evolutionary importance. Current statistical approaches for the detection of ancient WGDs in a phylogenetic context have two main drawbacks. The first is that unwarranted restrictive assumptions on the "background" gene duplication and loss rates make inferences unreliable in the face of model violations. The second is that most methods can only be used to examine a limited set of a priori selected WGD hypotheses and cannot be used to discover WGDs in a phylogeny. In this study, we develop an approach for WGD inference using gene count data that seeks to overcome both issues. We employ a phylogenetic birth-death model that includes WGD in a flexible hierarchical Bayesian approach and use reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo to perform Bayesian inference of branch-specific duplication, loss, and WGD retention rates across the space of WGD configurations. We evaluate the proposed method using simulations, apply it to data sets from flowering plants, and discuss the statistical intricacies of model-based WGD inference.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenetic TechniquesGenomeModels, GeneticPhylogenyBayes TheoremChromosome DuplicationComputer SimulationMagnoliopsidaMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodPolyploidyBayesian inferencegene content evolutiongenome duplicationphylogeneticsreversible-jump MCMC

Identifiers

PMID32359154
PMCPMC7116244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.