ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2020
Model-Based Detection of Whole-Genome Duplications in a Phylogeny.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using reciprocally retained gene families to detect whole-genome multiplications in plants.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Pervasive genome duplications across the plant tree of life and their links to major evolutionary innovations and transitions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Whole-genome microsynteny-based phylogeny of angiosperms.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Mirage: estimation of ancestral gene-copy numbers by considering different evolutionary patterns among gene families.Bioinformatics advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ancient whole-genome duplications (WGDs) leave signatures in comparative genomic data sets that can be harnessed to detect these events of presumed evolutionary importance. Current statistical approaches for the detection of ancient WGDs in a phylogenetic context have two main drawbacks. The first is that unwarranted restrictive assumptions on the "background" gene duplication and loss rates make inferences unreliable in the face of model violations. The second is that most methods can only be used to examine a limited set of a priori selected WGD hypotheses and cannot be used to discover WGDs in a phylogeny. In this study, we develop an approach for WGD inference using gene count data that seeks to overcome both issues. We employ a phylogenetic birth-death model that includes WGD in a flexible hierarchical Bayesian approach and use reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo to perform Bayesian inference of branch-specific duplication, loss, and WGD retention rates across the space of WGD configurations. We evaluate the proposed method using simulations, apply it to data sets from flowering plants, and discuss the statistical intricacies of model-based WGD inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.