ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2020
Degradation of the Repetitive Genomic Landscape in a Close Relative of Caenorhabditis elegans.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulatory Logic and Transposable Element Dynamics in Caenorhabditis Genomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Conservative evolution of genetic and genomic features inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Pervasive Conservation of Intron Number and Other Genetic Elements Revealed by a Chromosome-level Genome Assembly of the Hyper-polymorphic Nematode Caenorhabditis brenneri.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Selection Can Favor a Recombination Landscape That Limits Polygenic Adaptation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Widespread changes in gene expression accompany body size evolution in nematodes.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Pervasive conservation of intron number and other genetic elements revealed by a chromosome-level genomic assembly of the hyper-polymorphic nematodebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Patterns of Genomic Diversity in a Fig-Associated Close Relative of Caenorhabditis elegans.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Comparative Genomics of Sex, Chromosomes, and Sex Chromosomes in Caenorhabditis elegans and Other Nematodes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Review
- Widespread changes in gene expression accompany body size evolution in nematodes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Genomic diversity landscapes in outcrossing and selfing Caenorhabditis nematodes.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Differentially Expressed Genes Associated with Body Size Changes and Transposable Element Insertions between Caenorhabditis elegans and Its Sister Species, Caenorhabditis inopinata.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Analysis of repeat elements in the Pristionchus pacificus genome reveals an ancient invasion by horizontally transferred transposons.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- IntraspecificNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Nematode chromosomes.Genetics · 2022Review
- Charting the genomic landscape of seed-free plants.Nature plants · 2021Review
- Chromosome-Level Assembly of theGenetics · 2020Article
- Genetic exchange with an outcrossing sister species causes severe genome-wide dysregulation in a selfingGenome researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The abundance, diversity, and genomic distribution of repetitive elements is highly variable among species. These patterns are thought to be driven in part by reproductive mode and the interaction of selection and recombination, and recombination rates typically vary by chromosomal position. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, repetitive elements are enriched at chromosome arms and depleted on centers, and this mirrors the chromosomal distributions of other genomic features such as recombination rate. How conserved is this genomic landscape of repeats, and what evolutionary forces maintain it? To address this, we compared the genomic organization of repetitive elements across five Caenorhabditis species with chromosome-level assemblies. As previously reported, repeat content is enriched on chromosome arms in most Caenorhabditis species, and no obvious patterns of repeat content associated with reproductive mode were observed. However, the fig-associated C. inopinata has experienced repetitive element expansion and reveals no association of global repeat density with chromosome position. Patterns of repeat superfamily specific distributions reveal this global pattern is driven largely by a few repeat superfamilies that in C. inopinata have expanded in number and have weak associations with chromosome position. Additionally, 15% of predicted protein-coding genes in C. inopinata align to transposon-related proteins. When these are excluded, C. inopinata has no enrichment of genes in chromosome centers, in contrast to its close relatives who all have such clusters. Forward evolutionary simulations reveal that chromosomal heterogeneity in recombination rate alone can generate structured repetitive genomic landscapes when insertions are weakly deleterious, whereas chromosomal heterogeneity in the fitness effects of transposon insertion can promote such landscapes across a variety of evolutionary scenarios. Thus, patterns of gene density along chromosomes likely contribute to global repetitive landscapes in this group, although other historical or genomic factors are needed to explain the idiosyncrasy of genomic organization of various transposable element taxa within C. inopinata. Taken together, these results highlight the power of comparative genomics and evolutionary simulations in testing hypotheses regarding the causes of genome organization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.