Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32359142›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2020

Dose-response effects of dietary protein on muscle protein synthesis during recovery from endurance exercise in young men: a double-blind randomized trial.

Tyler A Churchward-Venne, Philippe J M Pinckaers, Joey S J Smeets, Milan W Betz, Joan M Senden, Joy P B Goessens, Annemie P Gijsen, Ian Rollo, Lex B Verdijk, Luc J C van Loon

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tyler A Churchward-VenneNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Philippe J M PinckaersNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Joey S J SmeetsNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Milan W BetzNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Joan M SendenNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Joy P B GoessensNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Annemie P GijsenNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Ian RolloGatorade Sports Science Institute, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Lex B VerdijkNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Luc J C van LoonNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProtein ingestion increases skeletal muscle protein synthesis rates during recovery from endurance exercise.

objectivesWe aimed to determine the effect of graded doses of dietary protein co-ingested with carbohydrate on whole-body protein metabolism, and skeletal muscle myofibrillar (MyoPS) and mitochondrial (MitoPS) protein synthesis rates during recovery from endurance exercise.

methodsIn a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design, 48 healthy, young, endurance-trained men (mean ± SEM age: 27 ± 1 y) received a primed continuous infusion of l-[ring-2H5]-phenylalanine, l-[ring-3,5-2H2]-tyrosine, and l-[1-13C]-leucine and ingested 45 g carbohydrate with either 0 (0 g PRO), 15 (15 g PRO), 30 (30 g PRO), or 45 (45 g PRO) g intrinsically l-[1-13C]-phenylalanine and l-[1-13C]-leucine labeled milk protein after endurance exercise. Blood and muscle biopsy samples were collected over 360 min of postexercise recovery to assess whole-body protein metabolism and both MyoPS and MitoPS rates.

resultsProtein intake resulted in ∼70%-74% of the ingested protein-derived phenylalanine appearing in the circulation. Whole-body net protein balance increased dose-dependently after ingestion of 0, 15, 30, or 45 g protein (mean ± SEM: -0.31± 0.16, 5.08 ± 0.21, 10.04 ± 0.30, and 13.49 ± 0.55 μmol phenylalanine · kg-1 · h-1, respectively; P < 0.001). 30 g PRO stimulated a ∼46% increase in MyoPS rates (%/h) compared with 0 g PRO and was sufficient to maximize MyoPS rates after endurance exercise. MitoPS rates were not increased after protein ingestion; however, incorporation of dietary protein-derived l-[1-13C]-phenylalanine into de novo mitochondrial protein increased dose-dependently after ingestion of 15, 30, and 45 g protein at 360 min postexercise (0.018 ± 0.002, 0.034 ± 0.002, and 0.046 ± 0.003 mole percentage excess, respectively; P < 0.001).

conclusionsProtein ingested after endurance exercise is efficiently digested and absorbed into the circulation. Whole-body net protein balance and dietary protein-derived amino acid incorporation into mitochondrial protein respond to increasing protein intake in a dose-dependent manner. Ingestion of 30 g protein is sufficient to maximize MyoPS rates during recovery from a single bout of endurance exercise.This trial was registered at trialregister.nl as NTR5111.

Indexed as

AdultAmino AcidsDietary ProteinsDouble-Blind MethodEndurance TrainingExerciseHumansMaleMuscle ProteinsMuscle, SkeletalAmino AcidsDietary ProteinsMuscle Proteinscarbohydratedietary proteindose-responseendurance exercisemitochondrial protein synthesismyofibrillar protein synthesisskeletal muscleyoung men

Identifiers

PMID32359142
PMCPMC7398777
OpenAlexW3023379271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.