Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358968›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2020

Epidemiological analysis of peripartum hysterectomy across nine European countries.

Athanasios F Kallianidis, Alice Maraschini, Jakub Danis, Lotte B Colmorn, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Serena Donati, Mika Gissler, Maija Jakobsson, Marian Knight, Alexandra Kristufkova and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Complex caesarean delivery.Case reports in women's health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Peripartum Haemorrhage: Haemostatic Aspects of the Updated Peripartum Haemorrhage Guideline of the German-Speaking Countries.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2023
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Uterine Factor Infertility, a Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

Athanasios F KallianidisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6078-1185
Alice MaraschiniNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4754-5385
Jakub Danis1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Lotte B ColmornDepartment of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7570-2822
Catherine Deneux-TharauxInserm U1153, Obstetric, Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Center for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6561-3321
Serena DonatiNational Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-2072
Mika GisslerInformation Services Department, THL Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8254-7525
Maija JakobssonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hyvinkää hospital HUCH, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0075-8375
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1984-4575
Alexandra Kristufkova1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Pelle G LindqvistClinical Science and Education, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institute, Sodersjukhuset Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1652-8235
Griet VandenbergheDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7420-5020
Thomas Van Den AkkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9890-9145
INOSS (the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems)
Comenius University Bratislava · SKIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITKarolinska Institutet · SELeiden University Medical Center · NLGhent University Hospital · BEInserm · FRRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeripartum hysterectomy is a surgical procedure performed for severe obstetric complications such as major obstetric hemorrhage. The prevalence of peripartum hysterectomy in high-resource settings is relatively low. Hence, international comparisons and studying indications and associations with mode of birth rely on the use of national obstetric survey data. Objectives were to calculate the prevalence and indications of peripartum hysterectomy and its association with national cesarean section rates and mode of birth in nine European countries. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe performed a descriptive, multinational, population-based study among women who underwent peripartum hysterectomy. Data were collected from national or multiregional databases from nine countries participating in the International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems. We included hysterectomies performed from 22 gestational weeks up to 48 hours postpartum for obstetric hemorrhage, as this was the most restrictive, overlapping case definition between all countries. Main outcomes were prevalence and indications of peripartum hysterectomy. Additionally, we compared prevalence of peripartum hysterectomy between women giving birth vaginally and by cesarean section, and between women giving birth with and without previous cesarean section. Finally, we calculated correlation between prevalence of peripartum hysterectomy and national cesarean section rates, as well as national rates of women giving birth after a previous cesarean section.

resultsA total of 1302 peripartum hysterectomies were performed in 2 498 013 births, leading to a prevalence of 5.2 per 10 000 births ranging from 2.6 in Denmark to 10.7 in Italy. Main indications were uterine atony (35.3%) and abnormally invasive placenta (34.8%). Relative risk of hysterectomy after cesarean section compared with vaginal birth was 9.1 (95% CI 8.0-10.4). Relative risk for hysterectomy for birth after previous cesarean section compared with birth without previous cesarean section was 10.6 (95% CI 9.4-12.1). A strong correlation was observed between national cesarean section rate and prevalence of peripartum hysterectomy (ρ = 0.67, P < .05).

conclusionsPrevalence of peripartum hysterectomy may vary considerably between high-income countries. Uterine atony and abnormally invasive placenta are the commonest indications for hysterectomy. Birth by cesarean section and birth after previous cesarean section are associated with nine-fold increased risk of peripartum hysterectomy.

Indexed as

Peripartum PeriodAdultCesarean SectionEuropeFemaleHumansHysterectomyPlacenta DiseasesPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyPrevalenceUterine InertiaUterine RuptureVaginal Birth after Cesareancesarean sectionmaternal morbiditymode of birthobstetric hemorrhageperipartum hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID32358968
PMCPMC7540498
OpenAlexW3022258411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.