ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Ecological risk assessment of heavy metals to aquatic organisms in the Lhasa River, Tibet, China.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Copper-Induced Thyroid Disruption and Oxidative Stress inAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Viromics Reveals the High Diversity of Viruses from Fishes of the Tibet Highland.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Symbiotic Microorganisms and Their Different Association Types in Aquatic and Semiaquatic Bugs.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Lhasa River is the largest and most important tributary of the Yarlung Tsangpo River on the Tibetan Plateau, China. It is an important source of drinking water and irrigation for the inhabitants living in the watershed. Despite the increasing focus on water chemistry, the ecological risk assessment (ERA) caused by heavy metals to aquatic organisms in the Lhasa River has not been performed before. Based on the documented monitoring data for heavy metals, the species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) method was applied in this study. The potential ecological risks induced by eight major heavy metals (including arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), mercury (Hg), manganese (Mn), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn)) in the Lhasa River to four typical categories of freshwater organisms, including insects, crustaceans, fish, and mollusks, were assessed in different water periods (e.g., high, normal, and low water-periods). Results suggested that the downstream part of the Lhasa River and the Meldromarchu and Tölungchu tributaries are the principal zones for the high aquatic ecological risks. For most of the monitoring sites, the ecological risks decreased in the following order: high-water period > normal-water period > low-water period. During the high-water period, Cu had the highest ecological risks for all selected species. For the insects, the ecological risks were quite low (< 1%) throughout the year. These results suggested that particular attention should be paid to the contamination of certain heavy metals (e.g., Cu and Cr) in the future water management in the Lhasa River.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32358753What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.