Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358725›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020

The ballistic performance of bone when impacted by fragments.

A J Caister, D J Carr, P D Campbell, F Brock, J Breeze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Extra-capsular proximal femoral fractures: a cohort comparison of union and complication rates after ballistic versus blunt trauma.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Ballistic Gels in Experimental Fracture Setting.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Interpol review of forensic firearm examination 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A J CaisterCaister Consultancy Ltd, Winchester, SO23 9HX, UK.
D J CarrDefence and Security Accelerator, Porton Down, Wiltshire, SP4 0JQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9476-2166
P D CampbellDepartment of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, South Kensington, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
F BrockCranfield Forensic Institute, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, Oxon, SN6 8LA, UK. f.brock@cranfield.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0728-6091
J BreezeRoyal Centre for Defence Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2352-1365

Funding

Atomic Weapons Establishment n/aCranfield University n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical models are required to generate the underlying algorithms that populate computer simulations of the effects of explosive fragmenting devices. These models and simulations are used for understanding weapon performance, designing buildings and optimising personal protective equipment. Previous experimental work has investigated the performance of skin and muscle when subjected to fragmentation threats, but limited evidence exists for the performance of bone when impacted by fragments. In the current work, ballistic testing was conducted using two types of internationally recognised steel fragment simulating projectiles (FSPs): (i) 5.5 mm diameter (0.68 g) ball bearing (BBs) and (ii) 1.10 g chisel nosed (CN). These projectiles were fired at isolated swine ribs at impact velocities between 99 and 1265 m/s. Impact events were recorded using a high-speed camera. Selected specimens were analysed post-impact with plain x-radiographs and micro-CT scanning to determine damage to the bone architecture. Bones were perforated with a kinetic energy density (KED) as low as 0.14 J/mm

Indexed as

Forensic BallisticsAnimalsBone and BonesHumansModels, AnatomicModels, AnimalSwineWounds, GunshotArmour designMicro-CTSwine ribsWound ballistics

Identifiers

PMID32358725
PMCPMC7295711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.