Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358716›Full record

ReviewInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2020

Significance of norovirus in occupational health: a review of published norovirus outbreaks in Central and Northern Europe.

Felix Martin Hofmann, Edward Olawumi, Martina Michaelis, Ulrich Stößel, Friedrich Hofmann

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. An Umbrella Review of the Work and Health Impacts of Working in an Epidemic/Pandemic Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Felix Martin HofmannResearch Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), Bertoldstraße 63, 79098, Freiburg, Germany. mahofmann@ffas.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9882-2613
Edward OlawumiResearch Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), Bertoldstraße 63, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Martina MichaelisResearch Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), Bertoldstraße 63, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Ulrich StößelResearch Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), Bertoldstraße 63, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Friedrich HofmannResearch Centre for Occupational and Social Medicine (FFAS), Bertoldstraße 63, 79098, Freiburg, Germany.
Research Centre for Applied System Safety and Industrial Medicine · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGlobally, norovirus (NoV) is the leading cause of gastroenteritis infection among all ages. The development of prevention strategies in the field of occupational health requires a detailed knowledge about the impact of the disease on employees. This review article aims not only at evaluating the burden of NoV outbreaks on staff but also at discussing implications for future prevention strategies.

methodsPublished NoV outbreaks in Central and Northern Europe were identified via a systematic literature search. Additionally, published NoV outbreaks in Germany were detected via a manual literature search. Key epidemiological data, as the number of symptomatic staff, was then extracted. The proportion of affected employees was calculated for each dataset (single NoV outbreaks or aggregated data of multiple outbreaks).

resultsOverall, 116 datasets were extracted from 72 relevant articles. 144,852 persons were affected by NoV gastroenteritis, 25,408 out of them (17.5%) were employees. 23,874 (94.0%) of them fell sick during outbreaks in hospitals and related settings. NoV cases among personnel in food establishments were reported only sporadically (mean ratio: 0.01).

conclusionsEmployees in hospitals and community facilities seem quantitatively to be most vulnerable towards NoV epidemics. Therefore, high quality of prevention measures in these settings, respective compliance with prevention strategies should have the highest priority. The disease can be considered as an occupational disease, even regularly without long-term consequences. Following work safety rules, a vaccination for vulnerable groups should be recommended if the vaccine development turns out to be successful.

Indexed as

NorovirusCaliciviridae InfectionsDisease OutbreaksEuropeFood ServicesGastroenteritisHealth PersonnelHumansOccupational DiseasesCentral/Northern EuropeNorovirus gastroenteritisOccupational healthOutbreak

Identifiers

PMID32358716
PMCPMC7222890
OpenAlexW3023809641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.