Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358715›Full record

SynthesisHead and neck pathology2020

Comparison of Molecular Methods and BRAF Immunohistochemistry (VE1 Clone) for the Detection of BRAF V600E Mutation in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Kyle G Parker, Michael G White, Nicole A Cipriani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Head and neck pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06901908 (Role of Cytomorphometry and BRAFV600E Immunocytochemistry With a Cytologic Diagnosis "Suspicious for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma"), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06901908 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Role of Cytomorphometry and BRAFV600E Immunocytochemistry With a Cytologic Diagnosis "Suspicious for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma"

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsSuspicious for Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. HighMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Cancers · 2022
    Review
  20. Preoperative BRAFAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle G ParkerDepartment of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. Kyle.Parker@uchospitals.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7140-7655
Michael G WhiteDepartment of General Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Nicole A CiprianiDepartment of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of surgically resected papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC) by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for BRAF mutation has diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications. The goal of this meta-analysis was to perform a systematic review of studies using the VE1 clone (specific for detection of the BRAF V600E mutation) on formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) thyroid surgical resection specimens for primary papillary thyroid carcinoma. The authors' molecular techniques, immunohistochemistry protocols, and scoring methods for VE1 immunostaining were also evaluated. This study included 4079 PTCs representing data from 23 studies. The results extracted from each study were split into two different groups, direct sequencing group or PCR group, based on the molecular "gold standard" method used to compare VE1 IHC staining. In the direct sequencing group, the IHC sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 0.97-1.00) and specificity 84% (95% 0.72-0.91). In the PCR group the sensitivity was 98% (95% CI 0.96-0.99) and specificity 89% (95% CI 0.82-0.94). Although immunohistochemical procedures varied by author, the overall performance of the VE1 clone shows that it is highly sensitive and relatively specific for detecting the BRAF V600E mutation in surgical resection specimens. However, standardization of immunohistochemical procedural method and scoring/interpretation criteria may improve the reliability and reproducibility for the use of VE1 clone for future practice.

Indexed as

Genetic TechniquesAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmunohistochemistryMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafThyroid Cancer, PapillaryThyroid NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiomarkers, TumorBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAFV600EImmunohistochemistryMeta-analysisPapillary thyroid carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID32358715
PMCPMC7669962
OpenAlexW3020903347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.