ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2020
Achievable pin spanning angulation in anterosuperior pelvic external fixation.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurement of the sustentaculum tali range and biomechanical screw analysis based on the space shape of the calcaneal trabeculae.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Radiographic parameters and feasibility analysis of dual sacral-2 alar-iliac screw fixation using three-dimensional digital technology.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Biomechanical comparative study on external fixators of new configurations in the treatment of Tile C pelvic injury.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Study of anatomical parameters and intraoperative fluoroscopic techniques for transiliac crest anterograde lag screws fixation of the posterior column of the acetabulum.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPelvic external fixation using anterosuperior pins provides a quick method of stabilization without necessitating fluoroscopic guidance. Various locations, depths, and inclinations have been cited for external fixator pins; however, the existing literature lacks clear indications for the angular difference between pins. Thus, we aimed to determine the greatest degree of sagittal pin spanning angulation (SPSA) between two iliac crest pins and how intraosseous depth (ID) affects these angulations. MATERIALS AND
methodsA newly developed computer algorithm produced cross sections of 3D pelvic reconstructions in the sagittal plane in 5° increments. Computer-generated pins with IDs of 60, 75, and 90 mm were positioned in 5° increments transversely. Pins were assessed for cortical containment to define values for SPSA and transverse pin spanning angulation (TPSA).
resultsA bimodal distribution revealed varying degrees of insertion frequency and SPSA, cranially and caudally. The caudal distribution exhibited greater cortical containment with larger values for SPSA and TPSA. The highest insertion frequency (85.7%) and largest SPSA (155°) were observed for the 60-mm ID. Increasing ID resulted in further bony penetration and smaller values for SPSA and TPSA.
conclusionsExpanding the degree of SPSA between inserted pins in anterosuperior pelvic external fixation can be challenging due to the thinning of the iliac wing, which affords a narrow corridor for intraosseous pin containment. An ID of 60 mm allows larger degrees of SPSA while maintaining higher rates of cortical pin containment when compared to pins with greater IDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32358714What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.