Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358713›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2020

Functional outcome in giant cell tumor of distal radius treated with excision and fibular arthroplasty: a case series.

Sitanshu Barik, Aakriti Jain, Sabeel Ahmad, Vivek Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Management of giant cell tumors of the distal radius: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution.

Sitanshu BarikDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 318, Building 86, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
Aakriti JainDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 318, Building 86, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India. jain.aj.0910@gmail.com.
Sabeel AhmadDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 318, Building 86, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
Vivek SinghDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 318, Building 86, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, 249203, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Rishikesh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGiant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is a locally aggressive benign neoplasm that is associated with a wide spectrum of biological activity ranging from latent benign to highly recurrent and has occasional metastatic potential. It affects the meta-epiphyseal region of long bones of young adults with most common site involved is the distal femur, followed by the distal radius. Plain radiographs and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging are the imaging modalities widely used followed by definite histopathology for diagnosis. Surgical treatment with curettage is considered optimal for local tumor control. Tumor excision with tumor-free margins is associated with lesser recurrence rates; however, for periarticular lesions this is usually accompanied with a suboptimal functional outcome.

methodsEleven eligible patients (all females, mean age 39.2 years) with Campanacci grade III GCT of the distal radius who were treated by en bloc resection and reconstruction with non-vascularized proximal fibular autografts at a single centre between July 2016 and December 2017 were included in the study. The patients had a clinical and radiographic review every month for the first 6 months, then biannually for minimum of 2 years. The functional, oncologic and radiological outcomes of the patients were analyzed and recorded.

resultsThe mean duration of follow-up was 31.9 months. Bony union was achieved in all cases. The mean VAS score at 6 months was 1.1 (range 0-2). The mean Mayo Wrist score was 66.36 (range 55-80) with mean MSTS score was 21.09 (range 18-24). The average range of motion of the wrist was: 37.3° ± 6.9° of flexion, 47.1° ± 7.5° of extension, 57.3° ± 7.8° of supination and 63.6° ± 6.4° of pronation. The average graft length used was 15.6 cm. The complications noted were lung metastases which developed preoperatively, local site recurrence, wrist joint subluxation, foot drop and wound complication. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsThe primary aim of treating GCT distal radius is oncologically sound resection with good functional outcome and cosmesis being secondary. Reconstruction with a non-vascularized proximal fibular autograft is a reasonable option after en bloc resection of the distal radius for giant cell tumor of bone having comparable results with other treatment modalities.

Indexed as

ArthroplastyBone NeoplasmsGiant Cell Tumor of BonePostoperative ComplicationsRadiusWristAdultBone TransplantationDissectionFemaleFibulaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareRadiographyDistal radiusFibular arthroplastyGiant cell tumorReconstruction

Identifiers

PMID32358713
OpenAlexW3021298769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.