Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358648›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Assessing breast cancer risk within the general screening population: developing a breast cancer risk model to identify higher risk women at mammographic screening.

Mohamed Abdolell, Jennifer I Payne, Judy Caines, Kaitlyn Tsuruda, Penny J Barnes, Pam J Talbot, Olivia Tong, Peter Brown, Michael Rivers-Bowerman, Sian Iles

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Performance of polygenic risk scores for cancer prediction in a racially diverse academic biobank.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mohamed AbdolellDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Rm 3016 Victoria Building, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada. mo@dal.ca.
Jennifer I PayneDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Rm 3016 Victoria Building, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Judy CainesDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Rm 3016 Victoria Building, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Kaitlyn TsurudaCancer Registry of Norway, PO Box 5313, Majorstuen, 0304, Oslo, Norway.
Penny J BarnesDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nova Scotia Health Authority, MacKenzie Building, QEII HSC, 5788 University Avenue, Halifax, NS, B3H 1V8, Canada.
Pam J TalbotDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Nova Scotia Health Authority, 1276 South Park Street, Victoria Building, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Olivia TongNova Scotia Breast Screening Program, IWK Health Centre, Suite 603L, 7001 Mumford Rd, Halifax, NS, B3L 2H8, Canada.
Peter BrownDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Rm 3016 Victoria Building, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Michael Rivers-BowermanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Rm 3016 Victoria Building, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada.
Sian IlesDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, 1276 South Park Street, Rm 3016 Victoria Building, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a breast cancer risk model to identify women at mammographic screening who are at higher risk of breast cancer within the general screening population.

methodsThis retrospective nested case-control study used data from a population-based breast screening program (2009-2015). All women aged 40-75 diagnosed with screen-detected or interval breast cancer (n = 1882) were frequency-matched 3:1 on age and screen-year with women without screen-detected breast cancer (n = 5888). Image-derived risk factors from the screening mammogram (percent mammographic density [PMD], breast volume, age) were combined with core biopsy history, first-degree family history, and other clinical risk factors in risk models. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Classifiers assigning women to low- versus high-risk deciles were derived from risk models. Agreement between classifiers was assessed using a weighted kappa.

resultsThe AUC was 0.597 for a risk model including only image-derived risk factors. The successive addition of core biopsy and family history significantly improved performance (AUC = 0.660, p < 0.001 and AUC = 0.664, p = 0.04, respectively). Adding the three remaining risk factors did not further improve performance (AUC = 0.665, p = 0.45). There was almost perfect agreement (kappa = 0.97) between risk assessments based on a classifier derived from image-derived risk factors, core biopsy, and family history compared with those derived from a model including all available risk factors.

conclusionsWomen in the general screening population can be risk-stratified at time of screen using a simple model based on age, PMD, breast volume, and biopsy and family history. KEY POINTS: • A breast cancer risk model based on three image-derived risk factors as well as core biopsy and first-degree family history can provide current risk estimates at time of screen. • Risk estimates generated from a combination of image-derived risk factors, core biopsy history, and first-degree family history may be more valid than risk estimates that rely on extensive self-reported risk factors. • A simple breast cancer risk model can avoid extensive clinical risk factor data collection.

Indexed as

MammographyAdultAgedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleBreastBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentBreastBreast densityBreast neoplasmsMammographyRisk assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.