Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358646›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound2021

Evaluation of diaphragm thickening by diaphragm ultrasonography: a reproducibility and a repeatability study.

Iacopo Cappellini, Fabio Picciafuochi, Maurizio Bartolucci, Simona Matteini, Gianni Virgili, Chiara Adembri

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07667608 (Ultrasound Assessment of Diaphragmatic Structure and Function in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07667608 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound Assessment of Diaphragmatic Structure and Function in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Point-of-Care Tool for Predicting Complications and Sarcopenia in Limited Resource Settings

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsCirrhosis of the Liver, Ascites, Pleural Effusion Disorder, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iacopo CappelliniDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. iacopo.cappellini@unifi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9596-458X
Fabio PicciafuochiRadiology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Maurizio BartolucciRadiology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Simona MatteiniDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Gianni VirgiliDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Chiara AdembriDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe have focused on the two-dimensional (B-mode) and the time-motion (M-mode) analysis of the zone of apposition to determine the reliability of diaphragm ultrasonography in the clinical environment.

methodsTen healthy volunteers were enrolled and studied by three operators with different skills in ultrasonography. For every volunteer, each operator acquired three images of the diaphragm for each side, both in B-mode and in M-mode. Then a fourth operator calculated the thickening fraction (TF), by means of the formula TF = (TEI - TEE)/TEE (TEI is the thickness at end inspiration and TEE the thickness at end expiration). Afterwards, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed on TF to establish reproducibility and repeatability both in the B- and M-modes. A Coefficient of Repeatability or repeatability (CR) ≤ 0.3 was considered acceptable.

resultsBoth B-mode (CRs 0.16-0.26) and M-mode (CRs 0.10-0.15) were sufficiently repeatable to assess TF, except for the less experienced operator (CRs B-Mode 0.20-0.32). Reproducibility was moderate to good between operators with CRs much narrower for the M-Mode (0.13-0.14).

conclusionsThe results of our study have shown that diaphragm ultrasound is repeatable and reproducible when carried out by a radiologist or an intensivist with a basic curriculum in ultrasonography. The method is more accurate when using the M-mode for less experienced operators, and in this case, repeatability and reproducibility are not sufficient to make clinical decisions. No TF value lower than 36% was obtained using both techniques. This suggests the existence of a cut-off value that could be used as an initial tool to discriminate healthy subjects from those affected by diaphragmatic dysfunction. CLINICAL

trial registrationEUDRACT 2015-004635-12.

Indexed as

DiaphragmHealthy VolunteersHumansReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyDiaphragm ultrasonographyRepeatability

Identifiers

PMID32358646
PMCPMC8572279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.