Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358645›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2020

Microbial keratitis in Sydney, Australia: risk factors, patient outcomes, and seasonal variation.

Pauline Khoo, Maria P Cabrera-Aguas, Vuong Nguyen, Monica M Lahra, Stephanie L Watson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Emerging microfluidic diagnostic systems for anterior segment diseases: a systematic review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial activity of a short guanidine mimic immobilised on contact lenses.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. First report of Stemphylium lycopersici keratitis, a complex corneal infection case.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Microbial keratitis in north-western Spain: a review of risk factors, microbiological profile and resistance patterns.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pauline KhooThe University of Sydney, Save Sight Institute, Discipline of Ophthalmology, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, South Block, Level 1, 8 Macquarie St, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia. pauline.khoo@sydney.edu.au.
Maria P Cabrera-AguasThe University of Sydney, Save Sight Institute, Discipline of Ophthalmology, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, South Block, Level 1, 8 Macquarie St, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia.
Vuong NguyenThe University of Sydney, Save Sight Institute, Discipline of Ophthalmology, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, South Block, Level 1, 8 Macquarie St, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia.
Monica M LahraMicrobiology Department, New South Wales Health Pathology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Stephanie L WatsonThe University of Sydney, Save Sight Institute, Discipline of Ophthalmology, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, South Block, Level 1, 8 Macquarie St, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide recent data on patient demographics, clinical profile and outcomes of patients with microbial keratitis over a 5-year period at the Sydney Eye Hospital, and to identify seasonal variations of the main causative organisms.

methodA retrospective study of patients with a clinical diagnosis of microbial keratitis and corneal scrape performed between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2016. Clinical information was gathered from medical records and pathology data.

resultsOne thousand fifty-two eyes from 979 patients with a mean age of 54.7 ± 21.5 years (range 18-100 years) were included. The majority of cases were bacterial (65%) followed by polymicrobial (2.4%), fungi (2.3%), and culture-negative (31%). Common risk factors for microbial keratitis were contact lens wear (63%) and previous topical steroid use (24%). Factors significantly associated with poor patient outcomes in the multivariate model were age, visual acuity, and epithelial defect size (p < 0.05). Patients with fungal or polymicrobial keratitis presented with worse clinical features at initial and final presentation (p < 0.05). There was a significant variation in the occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (p = 0.018) and fungal keratitis (predominately made up of Candida and Fusarium species) (p = 0.056) in the hottest seasons.

conclusionPoorer outcomes are more likely to be seen in older patients and those presenting with poor visual acuity and large epithelial defects at the initial presentation.

Indexed as

AustraliaEye Infections, BacterialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceKeratitisMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeasonsBacterial keratitisCorneaFungal keratitisInfectionKeratitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.