Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358482›Full record

Trial reportNutrition & diabetes2020

Postprandial blood glucose response: does the glycaemic index (GI) value matter even in the low GI range?

Bhupinder Kaur, Melvin Koh, Shalini Ponnalagu, Christiani Jeyakumar Henry

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrition & diabetes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07663123 (Health Assessment of Low Glycaemic Index - High Protein Rice to Enhance Glycemic Control Through Nutrition), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07663123 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Health Assessment of Low Glycaemic Index - High Protein Rice to Enhance Glycemic Control Through Nutrition (HARVEST) Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute for Human Development and Potential (IHDP), SingaporeRan2026 to 2029Enrolled225ConditionsPrediabetes / Type 2 DiabetesArmsFunctional rice variaties
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bhupinder KaurClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Melvin KohClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Shalini PonnalaguClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Christiani Jeyakumar HenryClinical Nutrition Research Centre (CNRC), Singapore Institute of Food and Biotechnology Innovation (SIFBI), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore. jeya_henry@sifbi.a-star.edu.sg.
Clinical Nutrition Research Centre · SGNational University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of research over the last decades has shown that diets based on the low glycaemic index (GI) foods reduce the risk of developing diabetes and improve blood glucose control in people with diabetes. The range of inflexion on the glycaemic response of low GI (LGI) foods is an interesting observation that has not been studied by many. LGI 1 (GI 54 ± 3.3) biscuit was formulated using a basic formulation while the LGI 2 (23.8 ± 3.3) biscuits was a modification of LGI 1 recipe, formulated with the inclusion of functional ingredients. Biscuits were formulated to be iso-caloric (kcal/100 g: 521 ± 12). Each participant consumed identical standard meals for lunch and dinner. Biscuits were consumed as breakfast and mid-afternoon snack. Using a randomized, controlled, crossover study, 13 males [(means ± SD) age: 25.3 ± 1.0 years, BMI 21.6 ± 0.5 kg/m

Indexed as

Glycemic IndexPostprandial PeriodAdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringBreakfastCross-Over StudiesDietDietary CarbohydratesFastingHumansInsulinMaleMealsYoung AdultBlood GlucoseDietary CarbohydratesInsulin

Identifiers

PMID32358482
PMCPMC7195487
OpenAlexW3022404555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.