ArticleMedicine2020
Study of efficacy and safety of Jiaotai pill in the treatment of depression.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Chemical Constituents of Jiaotai Pill Based on UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap-HRMS Technology and Its Antidiabetic Type 2 Mechanism in Network Pharmacology.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Article
- Spatial metabolomics in mental disorders and traditional Chinese medicine: a review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression is a common affective disorder characterized by marked and lasting melancholia, with corresponding thought and behavior changes. Due to an accelerated pace of life and increased work pressure, the incidence of depression has risen sharply, causing great harm to family and social life. Jiaotai pill (JTP) is a Chinese herbal formula that is commonly prescribed for depression and insomnia in clinical treatment, and exhibits antidepressant effects as shown in animal experimental research. However, there are no standard clinical trials to confirm its efficacy in treating depression.
objectiveThis study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of JTP in the treatment of depression, so as to tap the clinical efficacy advantages of JTP and provide data support for its clinical application.
methodsA randomized, multicenter clinical trial with parallel groups was designed in this study. A total of 40 patients with depression were included and randomly divided to either the treatment or the control group with a ratio of 1:1. The patients received JTP plus fluoxetine or fluoxetine alone once per day for 8 weeks. The primary outcome included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score for patients and brain structure and function by functional magnetic resonance imaging. The secondary outcomes included Traditional Chinese medicine syndrome integral scale scores, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, blood metabonomics, urine metabonomics.
conclusionThe results of this trial will find changes in brain structure, brain function, and metabolism in patients with depression, and provide critical evidence for JTP in the treatment of depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.