Observational studyMedicine2020
Prediction of microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in men with idiopathic nonobstruction azoospermia.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06524258 (Testicular Elastography for Predicting the Likelihood of Sperm Retrieval in Microscopic Testicular Sperm Extraction), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Testicular Elastography for Predicting the Likelihood of Sperm Retrieval in Microscopic Testicular Sperm Extraction
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biological and clinical factors predicting sperm retrieval success in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Review
- Association of higher serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels with successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcomes in nonobstructive azoospermic men with reduced testicular volumes.Asian journal of andrology · 2025Article
- Testicular volume is a noninvasive predictor of sperm retrieval failure in idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia.Asian journal of andrology · 2024Article
- Staged Laboratory Processing of Testicular Tissue in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia May Rescue Retrieving an Existing Sperm: A Case Report and Literature Review.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2023Article
- Azoospermic men with isolated elevation of folliclestimulating hormone represent a specific subpopulation of patients with poor reproductive outcomes.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2022Article
- Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia: summary of current literature.International urology and nephrology · 2021Review
- Hormonal Treatment of Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia: What Does the Evidence Suggest?Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Endocrine aberrations of human nonobstructive azoospermia.Asian journal of andrologyReview
- Can We Predict the Outcome of Micro Testicular Sperm Extraction in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia From Preoperative Hormonal Profile, Testicular Volume, and Patients Health Factors: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to assess whether the preoperative clinical indicators have an impact on sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in men with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA).We retrospectively studied 241 consecutive men with NOA who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction from 2016 to 2019 in the Reproductive Medicine Center, including 154 patients diagnosed with idiopathic NOA. They were grouped according to preoperative indicators, including average testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone, Testosterone (T), and pathology, respectively.The overall SRR was 20.0% (31/155). Men with testicular volume of ≤5 mL had significant higher SRR than men with testes 5 to 10 and ≥10 mL (35.6% vs 12.3%, P = .002; 35.6% vs 16.2, P = .049, respectively). The SRR in men with FSH ≥ 24.8 mIU/mL was significant higher, compared with FSH level of 12.4 to 24.8 mIU/mL (32.6% vs 15.8%, P = .033). Men with Sertoli cell-only had significantly lower SRR than other pathological type (8.1%). Men with an FSH ≥ 24.8 mIU/mL in testicular volume ≤5 mL group had a significantly higher SRR than FSH level of 12.4 to 24.8 mIU/mL in testicular volume of ≤5 to 10 mL group (44.0% vs 11.4%, P = .002). Men with a luteinizing hormone level of 8.6 to 17.2 mIU/mL in testicular volume of 5 to 10 mL group had a poor prognosis, with an SRR of only 6.5%.Severely reduced testicular volume (≤5 mL) and severely increased FSH level (≥24.8 mIU/mL) had the better sperm retrieval outcome, which can be used as independent predictors in men with idiopathic NOA. And a combination of testicular volume and the hormone seemed to be useful in further increase predictive value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.