Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358199›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Influence of spatially segregated IP

Laura C Gomez, Shin-Ya Kawaguchi, Thibault Collin, Abdelali Jalil, Maria Del Pilar Gomez, Enrico Nasi, Alain Marty, Isabel Llano

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. ClScience advances · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Functional Microstructure of CaThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Laura C GomezSaints Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7890-1392
Shin-Ya KawaguchiDepartment of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, 606-8502 Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8386-1185
Thibault CollinSaints Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3233-4860
Abdelali JalilSaints Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2710-8735
Maria Del Pilar GomezSaints Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France.
Enrico NasiSaints Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France.
Alain MartySaints Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France.
Isabel LlanoSaints Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, Université Paris Descartes, 75006 Paris, France; isabel.llano@parisdescartes.fr.
Délégation Paris 5 · FRKyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been known for a long time that inositol-trisphosphate (IP

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAxonsCalciumCerebellumInositol 1,4,5-TrisphosphateInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsNeuronsPresynaptic TerminalsPurkinje CellsReceptors, Purinergic P2Y1Type C PhospholipasesCalciumInositol 1,4,5-TrisphosphateInositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate ReceptorsReceptors, Purinergic P2Y1Type C PhospholipasesaxoncalciumcerebellumexcitabilityIP3

Identifiers

PMID32358199
PMCPMC7245073
OpenAlexW3021169347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.