Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32358057›Full record

ReviewRNA (New York, N.Y.)2020

Overcoming the bottleneck to widespread testing: a rapid review of nucleic acid testing approaches for COVID-19 detection.

Meagan N Esbin, Oscar N Whitney, Shasha Chong, Anna Maurer, Xavier Darzacq, Robert Tjian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 265 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
265citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

265 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. The establishment and optimization of aMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

205 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meagan N EsbinDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2157-3831
Oscar N WhitneyDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Shasha ChongDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Anna MaurerDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Xavier DarzacqDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Robert TjianDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.

Funding

THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF CELL FUNCTIONT32GM007232 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BILDER, DAVID, UNAL, ELCIN · 1985 to 2022
$36.4M
MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICS TRAINING GRANTT32GM008295 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HURLEY, JAMES H, WEMMER, DAVID E · 1989 to 2022
$8.1M
Stem Cell Engineering Training ProgramT32GM098218 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HEALY, KEVIN EDWARD, SCHAFFER, DAVID V · 2011 to 2020
$1.8M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007232NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008295NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM098218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic presents a serious public health crisis, and a better understanding of the scope and spread of the virus would be aided by more widespread testing. Nucleic-acid-based tests currently offer the most sensitive and early detection of COVID-19. However, the "gold standard" test pioneered by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention takes several hours to complete and requires extensive human labor, materials such as RNA extraction kits that could become in short supply, and relatively scarce qPCR machines. It is clear that a huge effort needs to be made to scale up current COVID-19 testing by orders of magnitude. There is thus a pressing need to evaluate alternative protocols, reagents, and approaches to allow nucleic-acid testing to continue in the face of these potential shortages. There has been a tremendous explosion in the number of papers written within the first weeks of the pandemic evaluating potential advances, comparable reagents, and alternatives to the "gold-standard" CDC RT-PCR test. Here we present a collection of these recent advances in COVID-19 nucleic acid testing, including both peer-reviewed and preprint articles. Due to the rapid developments during this crisis, we have included as many publications as possible, but many of the cited sources have not yet been peer-reviewed, so we urge researchers to further validate results in their own laboratories. We hope that this review can urgently consolidate and disseminate information to aid researchers in designing and implementing optimized COVID-19 testing protocols to increase the availability, accuracy, and speed of widespread COVID-19 testing.

Indexed as

Clinical Laboratory TechniquesBetacoronavirusCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic RepeatsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19 TestingCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansNasopharynxNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPoint-of-Care SystemsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Time FactorsUnited StatesRNA, Viralcovid-19CRISPRLAMPRT-PCRsars-cov-2

Identifiers

PMID32358057
PMCPMC7297120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.