Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357915›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2020

Is real time PCR preferable to the direct immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in HIV-infected patients?

Simon Bossart, Konrad Mühlethaler, Christian Garzoni, Hansjakob Furrer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of the ELITe InGenius PCR assay compared with immunofluorescence for Pneumocystis jirovecii detection in respiratory samples.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. An automated plasma-based proteotyping immunoassay for APOE ε4 zygosity classification in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  3. CRISPR-Cas12 Application for the Detection ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Quantitative PCR to Discriminate BetweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  8. A Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of LowFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Simon BossartDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Inselspital, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. simon.bossart@insel.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-302X
Konrad MühlethalerInstitute for Infectious Diseases, Clinical Microbiology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Christian GarzoniDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hansjakob FurrerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this study, we compared IFA and real-time PCR in bronchoalveolar lavage specimens of HIV infected patients. A total of 66 BALs from 62 HIV patients were included in the study. 30 IFA positive and 36 IFA negative specimens were tested with real-time PCR, targeting the major surface glycoprotein. We performed a retrospective analysis of the patient's medical records, compared the results of the IFA and PCR tests and analyzed costs, expenditure of time and personal expenses.

resultsAll of the 30 IFA positive samples were PCR positive. 35 of 36 IFA negative probes were also negative in the PCR assay. Considering the PCR results as a binary outcome (positive/negative) sensitivity was 100%, specificity 97.2%. The patient with negative IFA and positive PCR had a clear clinical picture of PCP and responded to PCP treatment. PCR was more than twice as expensive and time-consuming as IFA. Diagnostic accuracy for PCP of PCR and IFA was comparable in HIV-infected patients, but IFA was significantly less expensive and less time-consuming. Therefore, IFA testing can continue to be used as gold standard in the diagnosis of PCP in HIV patients. However, in special cases, IFA may lack sensitivity and PCR should be added to the diagnostic armamentarium.

Indexed as

AdultAIDS-Related Opportunistic InfectionsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, DirectHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, PneumocystisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionHIVImmunofluorescence assayPneumocystis jiroveciiPneumocystis pneumoniaReal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID32357915
PMCPMC7195742
OpenAlexW3023536170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.