Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357904›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2020

Validity and diagnostic performance of fluorescence optical imaging measuring synovitis in hand osteoarthritis: baseline results from the Nor-Hand cohort.

Øystein Maugesten, Alexander Mathiessen, Hilde Berner Hammer, Sigrid Valen Hestetun, Tore Kristian Kvien, Till Uhlig, Sarah Ohrndorf, Ida Kristin Haugen

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Øystein MaugestenDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Diakonveien 12, 0370, Oslo, Norway. oystein.maugesten@gmail.com.
Alexander MathiessenDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Diakonveien 12, 0370, Oslo, Norway.
Hilde Berner HammerDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Diakonveien 12, 0370, Oslo, Norway.
Sigrid Valen HestetunDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Diakonveien 12, 0370, Oslo, Norway.
Tore Kristian KvienDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Diakonveien 12, 0370, Oslo, Norway.
Till UhligDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Diakonveien 12, 0370, Oslo, Norway.
Sarah OhrndorfDepartment of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ida Kristin HaugenDepartment of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Diakonveien 12, 0370, Oslo, Norway.
Diakonhjemmet Hospital · NOCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFluorescence optical imaging (FOI) demonstrates enhanced microcirculation in finger joints as a sign of inflammation. We wanted to assess the validity and diagnostic performance of FOI measuring synovitis in persons with hand OA, comparing it with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- and ultrasound-detected synovitis.

methodsTwo hundred and twenty-one participants with hand OA underwent FOI and ultrasound (gray-scale synovitis and power Doppler activity) of the bilateral hands and contrast-enhanced MRI examination of the dominant hand. Fifteen joints in each hand were scored on semi-quantitative scales (grade 0-3) for all modalities. Four FOI images were evaluated: one composite image (Prima Vista Mode (PVM)) and three images representing phases of fluorescent dye distribution. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated between sum scores of FOI, MRI, and ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for FOI using MRI or ultrasound as reference.

resultsFOI did not demonstrate enhancement in the thumb base, and the joint was excluded from further analyses. FOI sum scores showed poor to fair correlations with MRI (rho 0.01-0.24) and GS synovitis sum scores (rho 0.12-0.25). None of the FOI images demonstrated both good sensitivity and specificity, and the AUC ranged from 0.50-0.61 and 0.51-0.63 with MRI and GS synovitis as reference, respectively. FOI demonstrated similar diagnostic performance with PD activity and GS synovitis as reference.

conclusionFOI enhancement correlated poorly with synovitis assessed by more established imaging modalities, questioning the value of FOI for the evaluation of synovitis in hand OA.

Indexed as

Hand JointsOptical ImagingOsteoarthritisSynovitisAgedFemaleFluorescenceHandHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedFOIHand osteoarthritisInflammationMRIOptical imagingSynovitisUltrasoundXiralite

Identifiers

PMID32357904
PMCPMC7193370
OpenAlexW3021541412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.