Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357891›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Impact of the diabetes Canada guideline dissemination strategy on dispensed vascular protective medications for older patients in Ontario, Canada: a linked EMR and administrative data study.

Michelle Greiver, Sumeet Kalia, Rahim Moineddin, Simon Chen, Raquel Duchen, Alanna Rigobon

Open access · goldFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle GreiverGordon F. Cheesbrough Chair in Family and Community Medicine Research, North York General Hospital, 4001 Leslie Street, LE-140, Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada. m.greiver@utoronto.ca.
Sumeet KaliaDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada.
Rahim MoineddinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 500 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1V7, Canada.
Simon ChenICES, G1 06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Raquel DuchenICES, G1 06, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada.
Alanna RigobonFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A8, Canada.
University of Toronto · CANorth York General Hospital · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research chronic disease network grant under the Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research SCA 145101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2013 Diabetes Canada guidelines recommended routinely using vascular protective medications for most patients with diabetes. These medications included statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Antiplatelet agents were only recommended for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Using Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data, we previously found that guideline dissemination efforts were not associated with an increase in the rate of primary care prescriptions of these medications. However, this needs confirmation: patients can receive prescriptions from different sources including specialists and they may not always fill these prescriptions. Using both EMR and administrative health data, we examined whether guideline dissemination impacted the dispensing of vascular protective medications to patients.

methodsThe study population included patients with diabetes aged 66 or over in Ontario, Canada. We created two cohorts using two different approaches: an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) algorithm for diabetes using linked EMR-administrative data and an administrative algorithm using population level administrative data. We examined data from January 2010 to December 2016. Patients with diabetes were deemed to be likely taking a medication (or covered) during a quarter if the daily amount for a dispensed medication would last for at least 75% of days in any given quarter. An interrupted time series analysis was used to assess the proportion of patients covered by each medication class. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were used as a reference.

resultsThere was no increase in the rate of change for medication coverage following guideline release in either the EMR or the administrative diabetes cohorts. For statins, the change in trend was - 0.03, p = 0.7 (EMR) and - 0.12, p = 0.04(administrative). For ACEI/ARBs, this was 0.03, p = 0.6 (EMR) and 0, p = 1(administrative). For antiplatelets, this was 0.001, P = .97 (EMR) and - 0.03, p = 0.03 (administrative). The comparator PPI was - 0.07, p = 0.4 (EMR) and - 0.11, p = 0.002 (administrative).

conclusionsUsing both EMR and administrative health data, we confirmed that the Diabetes Canada 2013 guideline dissemination strategy did not lead to an increased rate of coverage for vascular protective medications. Alternative strategies are needed to effect change in practice.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDiabetes MellitusDrug PrescriptionsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleOntarioPrimary Health CareAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCardiovascular diseases/prevention & controlDiabetes mellitusDrug utilizationElectronic health recordsGuideline adherencePrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID32357891
PMCPMC7195730
OpenAlexW3022490877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.