Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357886›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2020

Developing a digital training tool to support oncologists in the skill of information-provision: a user centred approach.

Sebastiaan M Stuij, Constance H C Drossaert, Nanon H M Labrie, Robert L Hulsman, Marie José Kersten, Sandra van Dulmen, Ellen M A Smets, INSTRUCT project group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Use of Chatbots in Oncological Care: A Narrative Review.International journal of general medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Using a Virtual Patient via an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot to Develop Dental Students' Diagnostic Skills.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sebastiaan M StuijDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Constance H C DrossaertDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Nanon H M LabrieDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert L HulsmanDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marie José KerstenCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sandra van DulmenNIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Ellen M A SmetsDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.m.a.smets@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8145-8595
INSTRUCT project group

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding AMCUVA-2014-6777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with cancer, being well informed by their oncologist about treatment options and the implications thereof is highly relevant. Communication skills training (CST) programs have shown to be effective in improving clinicians' communication skills, yet CSTs are time-consuming, inconvenient to schedule, and costly. Online education enables new ways of accessible learning in a safe and personalised environment. AIM AND

methodsWe describe the design of a digital CST-tool for information provision skills that meets oncologists' learning needs. We used the CeHRes Roadmap for user-centred design as a guiding framework. Phase 1 (Contextual Inquiry) involved consultation of the literature and a focus group interview study to uncover the learning needs and training preferences of clinicians' regarding a digital training for the skill of information-provision. In phase 2 (Value Specification), two multidisciplinary expert panels specified the learning content and format of a digital training. Phase 3 (Design) encompassed an iterative development process, including two user group assessment sessions and 5 individual user sessions in which prototypes were tested. All sessions were recorded and independently analyzed by two researchers.

resultsBased on literature and consultation of the users in the inquiry phase of the development process, and on expert opinion in the value specification phase, relevant (sub) skills and user requirements were defined to consider for the digital training format. It was decided to develop a conventional e-learning and a chatbot. Personalization and interactivity were integrated in the prototypes by including features that allow for e.g., choosing text, video or animation; to upload video-recorded consultations to receive peer-feedback; and to consult a communication expert. Results revealed that, overall, participants expressed a willingness to use a digital training tool to acquire information-provision skills. Individual user testing (including junior clinicians), indicated a preference for the chatbot over the e-learning.

conclusionWe offer a description of extensive development work which was conducted in collaboration with multiple health care professionals to iteratively develop two innovative prototypes of digital tools that would appropriately engage oncologists in learning effective information giving skills. The resulting prototypes were well appreciated and thus provide a solid basis for further development and testing.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePhysician-Patient RelationsPhysician's RoleCommunicationEducation, DistanceHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsOncologistsTruth DisclosureCommunication skills trainingCommunication technologyDoctor-patient communicationE-learningOncologyUser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID32357886
PMCPMC7195777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.