ArticleBMC medical education2020
Developing a digital training tool to support oncologists in the skill of information-provision: a user centred approach.
Article in BMC medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new paradigm for esophageal disease management: the application and future prospects of Shared Decision Making (SDM).World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Identifying the Challenges in Self-Management and Preferences for Digital Health Technologies Use Among COPD Patients Based on the CeHRes Roadmap: A Formative Qualitative Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Bridging the rural oncology gap: A conceptual, technical, and pragmatic framework for digital interventions.Cancer · 2025Article
- Patients' emotional expressions and clinicians' responses in oncology - From recognition to exploration of concerns.PEC innovation · 2025Article
- Desire to Die Communication Training for Professionals: Developing Online Formats.Palliative medicine reports · 2025Article
- An e-Learning Intervention for Professionals to Promote Family-Centered Cancer Care When a Significant Caregiver for Children Is at End of Life: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- How do hospital providers perceive and experience the information-delivery process? A qualitative exploratory study.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Educational Psychology Aspects of Learning with Chatbots without Artificial Intelligence: Suggestions for Designers.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023Article
- The Use of Chatbots in Oncological Care: A Narrative Review.International journal of general medicine · 2023Review
- Online learning in palliative care education of undergraduate medical students: a realist synthesis.Palliative care and social practice · 2023Article
- Using a Virtual Patient via an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot to Develop Dental Students' Diagnostic Skills.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Developing mHealth to the Context and Valuation of Injured Patients and Professionals in Hospital Trauma Care: Qualitative and Quantitative Formative Evaluations.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
- Methods for Human-Centered eHealth Development: Narrative Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Continuous care needs in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy during the recent omicron wave of COVID-19 in Shanghai: A qualitative study.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Development of a data utility framework to support effective health data curation.BMJ health & care informatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor patients with cancer, being well informed by their oncologist about treatment options and the implications thereof is highly relevant. Communication skills training (CST) programs have shown to be effective in improving clinicians' communication skills, yet CSTs are time-consuming, inconvenient to schedule, and costly. Online education enables new ways of accessible learning in a safe and personalised environment. AIM AND
methodsWe describe the design of a digital CST-tool for information provision skills that meets oncologists' learning needs. We used the CeHRes Roadmap for user-centred design as a guiding framework. Phase 1 (Contextual Inquiry) involved consultation of the literature and a focus group interview study to uncover the learning needs and training preferences of clinicians' regarding a digital training for the skill of information-provision. In phase 2 (Value Specification), two multidisciplinary expert panels specified the learning content and format of a digital training. Phase 3 (Design) encompassed an iterative development process, including two user group assessment sessions and 5 individual user sessions in which prototypes were tested. All sessions were recorded and independently analyzed by two researchers.
resultsBased on literature and consultation of the users in the inquiry phase of the development process, and on expert opinion in the value specification phase, relevant (sub) skills and user requirements were defined to consider for the digital training format. It was decided to develop a conventional e-learning and a chatbot. Personalization and interactivity were integrated in the prototypes by including features that allow for e.g., choosing text, video or animation; to upload video-recorded consultations to receive peer-feedback; and to consult a communication expert. Results revealed that, overall, participants expressed a willingness to use a digital training tool to acquire information-provision skills. Individual user testing (including junior clinicians), indicated a preference for the chatbot over the e-learning.
conclusionWe offer a description of extensive development work which was conducted in collaboration with multiple health care professionals to iteratively develop two innovative prototypes of digital tools that would appropriately engage oncologists in learning effective information giving skills. The resulting prototypes were well appreciated and thus provide a solid basis for further development and testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.