Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357833›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2020

The application of a neural network to predict hypotension and vasopressor requirements non-invasively in obstetric patients having spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section (C/S).

Irwin Gratz, Martin Baruch, Magdy Takla, Julia Seaman, Isabel Allen, Brian McEniry, Edward Deal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06158542 (Development of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Predict Hypotension Risk After Induction in Cesarean Sections With Spinal Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06158542 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Development of an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Predict Hypotension Risk After Induction in Cesarean Sections With Spinal Anesthesia

TypeobservationalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled370ConditionsSpinal Anesthesia Induced Hypotension, Caeserian SectionArmsSpinal Anesthesia, Blood Sampling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irwin GratzCooper University Hospital, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA. gratz-irwin@cooperhealth.edu.
Martin BaruchCaretaker Medical, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Magdy TaklaCooper University Hospital, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Julia SeamanQuahog Research Group, Oakland, CA, USA.
Isabel AllenUniversity of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brian McEniryCooper University Hospital, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Edward DealCooper University Hospital, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Cooper University Hospital · USCharlottesville Medical Research · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeural networks are increasingly used to assess physiological processes or pathologies, as well as to predict the increased likelihood of an impending medical crisis, such as hypotension.

methodWe compared the capabilities of a single hidden layer neural network of 12 nodes to those of a discrete-feature discrimination approach with the goal being to predict the likelihood of a given patient developing significant hypotension under spinal anesthesia when undergoing a Cesarean section (C/S). Physiological input information was derived from a non-invasive blood pressure device (Caretaker [CT]) that utilizes a finger cuff to measure blood pressure and other hemodynamic parameters via pulse contour analysis. Receiver-operator-curve/area-under-curve analyses were used to compare performance.

resultsThe results presented here suggest that a neural network approach (Area Under Curve [AUC] = 0.89 [p < 0.001]), at least at the implementation level of a clinically relevant prediction algorithm, may be superior to a discrete feature quantification approach (AUC = 0.87 [p < 0.001]), providing implicit access to a plurality of features and combinations thereof. In addition, the expansion of the approach to include the submission of other physiological data signals, such as heart rate variability, to the network can be readily envisioned.

conclusionThis pilot study has demonstrated that increased coherence in Arterial Stiffness (AS) variability obtained from the pulse wave analysis of a continuous non-invasive blood pressure device appears to be an effective predictor of hypotension after spinal anesthesia in the obstetrics population undergoing C/S. This allowed us to predict specific dosing thresholds of phenylephrine required to maintain systolic blood pressure above 90 mmHg.

Indexed as

AdultAnesthesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, SpinalBlood PressureCesarean SectionDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHeart RateHumansHypotensionNeural Networks, ComputerPhenylephrinePilot ProjectsPregnancyPulse Wave AnalysisVasoconstrictor AgentsPhenylephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsArterial stiffnessCesarean sectionFinger cuffHypotensionNeural networkNon-invasivePredictive algorithm

Identifiers

PMID32357833
PMCPMC7195764
OpenAlexW3023164562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.