Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357832›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2020

RNA-Seq and secondary metabolite analyses reveal a putative defence-transcriptome in Norway spruce (Picea abies) against needle bladder rust (Chrysomyxa rhododendri) infection.

Carlos Trujillo-Moya, Andrea Ganthaler, Wolfgang Stöggl, Ilse Kranner, Silvio Schüler, Reinhard Ertl, Sarah Schlosser, Jan-Peter George, Stefan Mayr

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Bark beetle (Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pathophysiology and transcriptomic analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Trujillo-MoyaFederal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Landscape and Natural Hazards (BFW)-Department of Forest Genetics, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, 1131, Vienna, Austria. carlos.trujillo-moya@bfw.gv.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9300-0226
Andrea GanthalerDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Wolfgang StögglDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ilse KrannerDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Silvio SchülerFederal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Landscape and Natural Hazards (BFW)- Department of Forest Growth & Silviculture, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, 1131, Vienna, Austria.
Reinhard ErtlVetCore Facility for Research, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Sarah SchlosserVetCore Facility for Research, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210, Vienna, Austria.
Jan-Peter GeorgeFederal Research and Training Centre for Forests, Landscape and Natural Hazards (BFW)-Department of Forest Genetics, Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, 1131, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan MayrDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwartestraße 15, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Universität Innsbruck · ATAustrian Research Centre for Forests · ATUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNorway spruce trees in subalpine forests frequently face infections by the needle rust fungus Chrysomyxa rhododendri, which causes significant growth decline and increased mortality of young trees. Yet, it is unknown whether trees actively respond to fungal attack by activating molecular defence responses and/or respective gene expression.

resultsHere, we report results from an infection experiment, in which the transcriptomes (via RNA-Seq analysis) and phenolic profiles (via UHPLC-MS) of control and infected trees were compared over a period of 39 days. Gene expression between infected and uninfected ramets significantly differed after 21 days of infection and revealed already known, but also novel candidate genes involved in spruce molecular defence against pathogens.

conclusionsCombined RNA-Seq and biochemical data suggest that Norway spruce response to infection by C. rhododendri is restricted locally and primarily activated between 9 and 21 days after infestation, involving a potential isolation of the fungus by a hypersensitive response (HR) associated with an activation of phenolic pathways. Identified key regulatory genes represent a solid basis for further specific analyses in spruce varieties with varying susceptibility, to better characterise resistant clones and to elucidate the resistance mechanism.

Indexed as

BasidiomycotaGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantGenome, PlantHost-Pathogen InteractionsMetabolic Networks and PathwaysPhenolsPiceaPlant DiseasesPlant ImmunityRNA-SeqSecondary MetabolismSignal TransductionTranscriptomePhenolsConiferForest treeFungal infectionHost-pathogen-interactionPhenolic compoundsPR proteinsRNA sequencingTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID32357832
PMCPMC7195740
OpenAlexW3022572722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.