Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357831›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

Negative binomial additive model for RNA-Seq data analysis.

Xu Ren, Pei-Fen Kuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sequences to Differences in Gene Expression: Analysis of RNA-Seq Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Naught all zeros in sequence count data are the same.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xu RenDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, 11794, NY, USA.
Pei-Fen KuanDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, 11794, NY, USA. peifen.kuan@stonybrook.edu.

Funding

Longitudinal genome-wide transcriptome study of PTSD symptom change in WTC respondersU01OH011478 · OH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI KUAN, PEI-FEN · 2017 to 2019
$1.5M
NIOSH CDC HHS U01 OH011478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-throughput sequencing experiments followed by differential expression analysis is a widely used approach for detecting genomic biomarkers. A fundamental step in differential expression analysis is to model the association between gene counts and covariates of interest. Existing models assume linear effect of covariates, which is restrictive and may not be sufficient for certain phenotypes.

resultsWe introduce NBAMSeq, a flexible statistical model based on the generalized additive model and allows for information sharing across genes in variance estimation. Specifically, we model the logarithm of mean gene counts as sums of smooth functions with the smoothing parameters and coefficients estimated simultaneously within a nested iterative method. The variance is estimated by the Bayesian shrinkage approach to fully exploit the information across all genes.

conclusionsBased on extensive simulations and case studies of RNA-Seq data, we show that NBAMSeq offers improved performance in detecting nonlinear effect and maintains equivalent performance in detecting linear effect compared to existing methods. The vignette and source code of NBAMSeq are available at http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/NBAMSeq.html.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisModels, StatisticalRNA-SeqBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansNonlinear DynamicsSoftwareBayesian shrinkageDifferential expression analysisGeneralized additive modelRNA-SeqSpline model

Identifiers

PMID32357831
PMCPMC7195715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.