Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357829›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

wg-blimp: an end-to-end analysis pipeline for whole genome bisulfite sequencing data.

Marius Wöste, Elsa Leitão, Sandra Laurentino, Bernhard Horsthemke, Sven Rahmann, Christopher Schröder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome-wide DNA methylation changes in human spermatogenesis.American journal of human genetics · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Sequences to Differences in Gene Expression: Analysis of RNA-Seq Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marius WösteInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, 48149, Germany. mar.w@wwu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4994-8380
Elsa LeitãoInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Sandra LaurentinoCentre of Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Institute of Reproductive and Regenerative Biology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Münster, 48149, Germany.
Bernhard HorsthemkeInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Sven RahmannGenome Informatics, Institute of Human Genetics, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.
Christopher SchröderInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, Essen, 45147, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KU1216Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GR 1547/19-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft HO 949/23-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TU 298/5-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnalysing whole genome bisulfite sequencing datasets is a data-intensive task that requires comprehensive and reproducible workflows to generate valid results. While many algorithms have been developed for tasks such as alignment, comprehensive end-to-end pipelines are still sparse. Furthermore, previous pipelines lack features or show technical deficiencies, thus impeding analyses.

resultsWe developed wg-blimp (whole genome bisulfite sequencing methylation analysis pipeline) as an end-to-end pipeline to ease whole genome bisulfite sequencing data analysis. It integrates established algorithms for alignment, quality control, methylation calling, detection of differentially methylated regions, and methylome segmentation, requiring only a reference genome and raw sequencing data as input. Comparing wg-blimp to previous end-to-end pipelines reveals similar setups for common sequence processing tasks, but shows differences for post-alignment analyses. We improve on previous pipelines by providing a more comprehensive analysis workflow as well as an interactive user interface. To demonstrate wg-blimp's ability to produce correct results we used it to call differentially methylated regions for two publicly available datasets. We were able to replicate 112 of 114 previously published regions, and found results to be consistent with previous findings. We further applied wg-blimp to a publicly available sample of embryonic stem cells to showcase methylome segmentation. As expected, unmethylated regions were in close proximity of transcription start sites. Segmentation results were consistent with previous analyses, despite different reference genomes and sequencing techniques.

conclusionswg-blimp provides a comprehensive analysis pipeline for whole genome bisulfite sequencing data as well as a user interface for simplified result inspection. We demonstrated its applicability by analysing multiple publicly available datasets. Thus, wg-blimp is a relevant alternative to previous analysis pipelines and may facilitate future epigenetic research.

Indexed as

Sequence Analysis, DNASoftwareWhole Genome SequencingDatabases, GeneticDNA MethylationHumansSulfitesUser-Computer Interfacehydrogen sulfiteSulfitesAnalysis pipelineAnalysis workflowEpigeneticsMethylationWhole-genome bisulfite sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32357829
PMCPMC7195798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.