Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357517›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Machine Learning and Virtual Reality on Body Movements' Behaviors to Classify Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Mariano Alcañiz Raya, Javier Marín-Morales, Maria Eleonora Minissi, Gonzalo Teruel Garcia, Luis Abad, Irene Alice Chicchi Giglioli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Digital tools for direct assessment of autism risk during early childhood: A systematic review.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mariano Alcañiz RayaInstituto de Investigación e Innovación en Bioingeniería (i3B), Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-0636
Javier Marín-MoralesInstituto de Investigación e Innovación en Bioingeniería (i3B), Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Maria Eleonora MinissiInstituto de Investigación e Innovación en Bioingeniería (i3B), Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Gonzalo Teruel GarciaInstituto de Investigación e Innovación en Bioingeniería (i3B), Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Luis AbadRed Cenit, Centros de Desarrollo Cognitivo, 46020 Valencia, Spain.
Irene Alice Chicchi GiglioliInstituto de Investigación e Innovación en Bioingeniería (i3B), Universitat Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2577-0039

Funding

European Union through the Operational Program of the European Regional development Fund (ERDF) of the Valencian Community 2014-2020 IDIFEDER/2018/029Generalitat Valenciana PROMETEU/2019/105Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness IDI-20170912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is mostly diagnosed according to behavioral symptoms in sensory, social, and motor domains. Improper motor functioning, during diagnosis, involves the qualitative evaluation of stereotyped and repetitive behaviors, while quantitative methods that classify body movements' frequencies of children with ASD are less addressed. Recent advances in neuroscience, technology, and data analysis techniques are improving the quantitative and ecological validity methods to measure specific functioning in ASD children. On one side, cutting-edge technologies, such as cameras, sensors, and virtual reality can accurately detect and classify behavioral biomarkers, as body movements in real-life simulations. On the other, machine-learning techniques are showing the potential for identifying and classifying patients' subgroups. Starting from these premises, three real-simulated imitation tasks have been implemented in a virtual reality system whose aim is to investigate if machine-learning methods on movement features and frequency could be useful in discriminating ASD children from children with typical neurodevelopment. In this experiment, 24 children with ASD and 25 children with typical neurodevelopment participated in a multimodal virtual reality experience, and changes in their body movements were tracked by a depth sensor camera during the presentation of visual, auditive, and olfactive stimuli. The main results showed that ASD children presented larger body movements than TD children, and that head, trunk, and feet represent the maximum classification with an accuracy of 82.98%. Regarding stimuli, visual condition showed the highest accuracy (89.36%), followed by the visual-auditive stimuli (74.47%), and visual-auditive-olfactory stimuli (70.21%). Finally, the head showed the most consistent performance along with the stimuli, from 80.85% in visual to 89.36% in visual-auditive-olfactory condition. The findings showed the feasibility of applying machine learning and virtual reality to identify body movements' biomarkers that could contribute to improving ASD diagnosis.

Indexed as

autism spectrum disorderbody movementsMachine learningrepetitive behaviorsvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID32357517
PMCPMC7287942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.