Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357416›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Current Trends in the Application of Nanomaterials for the Removal of Emerging Micropollutants and Pathogens from Water.

Petros Kokkinos, Dionissios Mantzavinos, Danae Venieri

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Petros KokkinosDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, Caratheodory 1, University Campus, GR-26504 Patras, Greece.
Dionissios MantzavinosDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, Caratheodory 1, University Campus, GR-26504 Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8920-6416
Danae VenieriSchool of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, GR-73100 Chania, Greece.
University of Patras · GRTechnical University of Crete · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water resources contamination has a worldwide impact and is a cause of global concern. The need for provision of clean water is becoming more and more demanding. Nanotechnology may support effective strategies for the treatment, use and reuse of water and the development of next-generation water supply systems. The excellent properties and effectiveness of nanomaterials make them particularly suitable for water/wastewater treatment. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the main categories of nanomaterials used in catalytic processes (carbon nanotubes/graphitic carbon nitride (CNT/g-C

Indexed as

CatalysisDisinfectionGraphiteMetal-Organic FrameworksNanostructuresNanotubes, CarbonNitrogen CompoundsOxidesWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater PurificationGraphitegraphitic carbon nitrideMetal-Organic FrameworksNanotubes, CarbonNitrogen CompoundsOxidesWastewaterWater Pollutants, Chemicalcarbon basedcatalytic processescompositesdegradationdisinfectiongraphenemetal organic frameworksmetal oxidesmicroorganismsnanomaterialspharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID32357416
PMCPMC7248945
OpenAlexW3017813027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.