ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
How Could Peers in Online Health Community Help Improve Health Behavior.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low Social Support and Risk for Depression in People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2022Pooled it
- A Conversational Agent for Providing Personalized Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Support: Protocol for Chatbot Implementation and Evaluation.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Deciphering patient selection of physicians in online health communities: insights from a dual-path perspective.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Impact on mental health and well-being of the dialogic literary gathering among women in a primary healthcare centre.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024Article
- Public health education using social learning theory: a systematic scoping review.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Online Health Communities: an alternative feasible data registry tool for developing countries.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- How information processing and risk/benefit perception affect COVID-19 vaccination intention of users in online health communities.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- How we learn social norms: a three-stage model for social norm learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Association between daily use of social media and behavioral lifestyles in the Saudi community: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Exploring Users' Health Behavior Changes in Online Health Communities: Heuristic-Systematic Perspective Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Exploring the Peer Effect of Physicians' and Patients' Participation Behavior: Evidence from Online Health Communities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- The Effect of Social Norms on Physicians' Intentions to Use Liver Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study Using Extended Theory of Planned Behavior.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Article
- A description of the current status of chronic fatigue syndrome and associated factors among university students in Wuhan, China.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Using Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling (MSEM) to Identify the Predictors and Influencing Mechanism of Technology Use Among Chinese Physicians: An Example from Des-Gamma-Carboxy Prothrombin (DCP).Risk management and healthcare policy · 2022Article
- Come for Information, Stay for Support: Harnessing the Power of Online Health Communities for Social Connectedness during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- How online communities are reshaping heat preparedness.The journal of climate change and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human behavior is the largest source of variance in health-related outcomes, and the increasingly popular online health communities (OHC) can be used to promote healthy behavior and outcomes. We explored how the social influence (social integration, descriptive norms and social support) exerted by online social relationships does affect the health behavior of users. Based on an OHC, we considered the effect of three types of social relationships (friendship, mutual support group and competing group) in the OHC. We found that social integration, descriptive norms and social support (information and emotional support) from the OHC had a positive effect on dietary and exercise behavior. Comparing the effects of different social relationships, we found that the stronger social relationship-friendship-had a stronger effect on health behavior than the mutual support group and competing group. Emotional support had a stronger effect on health behavior than informational support. We also found that the effects of social integration and informational support became stronger as membership duration increased, but the effects of the descriptive norms and emotional support became smaller. This study extended the research on health behavior to the online social environment and explored how the social influence exerted by various social relationships in an OHC affected health behavior. The results could be used for guiding users to make use of online social relationships for changing and maintaining healthy behavior, and helping healthcare websites improve their services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.