Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357405›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Assessment of an Assistive Control Approach Applied in an Active Knee Orthosis Plus Walker for Post-Stroke Gait Rehabilitation.

Ana Cecilia Villa-Parra, Jessica Lima, Denis Delisle-Rodriguez, Laura Vargas-Valencia, Anselmo Frizera-Neto, Teodiano Bastos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Atypical Gait Cycles in Parkinson's Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Cecilia Villa-ParraBiomedical Engineering Research Group-GIIB, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, Cuenca 010105, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0002-7588-9372
Jessica LimaPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), Vitoria 29047-105, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6294-5179
Denis Delisle-RodriguezPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), Vitoria 29075-910, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8937-031X
Laura Vargas-ValenciaPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), Vitoria 29075-910, Brazil.
Anselmo Frizera-NetoPostgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), Vitoria 29075-910, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0687-3967
Teodiano BastosPostgraduate Program in Biotechnology, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), Vitoria 29047-105, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-2773
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BRPolitecnica Salesiana University · EC

Funding

CAPES 88887.095626/2015-01),CNPq 304192/2016-3FAPES 72982608SENESCYT SENESCYT (Convocatoria Abierta 2012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study is the assessment of an assistive control approach applied to an active knee orthosis plus a walker for gait rehabilitation. The study evaluates post-stroke patients and healthy subjects (control group) in terms of kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity. Muscle and gait information of interest were acquired from their lower limbs and trunk, and a comparison was conducted between patients and control group. Signals from plantar pressure, gait phase, and knee angle and torque were acquired during gait, which allowed us to verify that the stance control strategy proposed here was efficient at improving the patients' gaits (comparing their results to the control group), without the necessity of imposing a fixed knee trajectory. An innovative evaluation of trunk muscles related to the maintenance of dynamic postural equilibrium during gait assisted by our active knee orthosis plus walker was also conducted through inertial sensors. An increase in gait cycle (stance phase) was also observed when comparing the results of this study to our previous work. Regarding the kinematics, the maximum knee torque was lower for patients when compared to the control group, which implies that our orthosis did not demand from the patients a knee torque greater than that for healthy subjects. Through surface electromyography (sEMG) analysis, a significant reduction in trunk muscle activation and fatigability, before and during the use of our orthosis by patients, was also observed. This suggest that our orthosis, together with the assistive control approach proposed here, is promising and could be considered to complement post-stroke patient gait rehabilitation.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyKneeOrthotic DevicesStroke RehabilitationAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleGaitHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalStrokeWalkingactive knee orthosisbiomechanical analysiselectromyographygait rehabilitationinertial sensorsrehabilitation roboticsstroke

Identifiers

PMID32357405
PMCPMC7249659
OpenAlexW3019407836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.