Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357370›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

Is a switch to a different electronic health record associated with a change in patient satisfaction?

Frederick North, Jennifer L Pecina, Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel, Rajeev Chaudhry, John C Matulis, Jon O Ebbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Applying requisite imagination to safeguard electronic health record transitions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Frederick NorthDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jennifer L PecinaDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Sidna M Tulledge-ScheitelDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Rajeev ChaudhryDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
John C MatulisDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jon O EbbertDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFinancial impacts associated with a switch to a different electronic health record (EHR) have been documented. Less attention has been focused on the patient response to an EHR switch. The Mayo Clinic was involved in an EHR switch that occurred at 6 different locations and with 4 different "go-live" dates. We sought to understand the relationship between patient satisfaction and the transition to a new EHR. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used patient satisfaction data collected by Press Ganey from July 2016 through December 2019. Our patient satisfaction measure was the percent of patients responding "very good" (top box) to survey questions. Twenty-four survey questions were summarized by Press Ganey into 6 patient satisfaction domains. Piecewise linear regression was used to model patient satisfaction before and after the EHR switch dates.

resultsSignificant drops in patient satisfaction were associated with the EHR switch. Patient satisfaction with access (ease of getting clinic on phone, ease of scheduling appointments, etc.) was most affected (range of 6 sites absolute decline: -3.4% to -8.8%; all significant at 99% confidence interval). Satisfaction with providers was least affected (range of 6 sites absolute decline: -0.5% to -2.8%; 4 of 6 sites significant at 99% confidence interval). After 9-15 months, patient satisfaction with access climbed back to pre-EHR switch levels.

conclusionsPatient satisfaction in several patient experience domains dropped significantly and stayed lower than pre-"go-live" for several months after a switch in EHR. Satisfaction with providers declined less than satisfaction with access.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAttitude to HealthHumansLinear ModelsPatient Access to RecordsPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Stateselectronic health recordelectronic medical recordpatient experiencepatient satisfactionPress Ganey

Identifiers

PMID32357370
PMCPMC7309264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.