ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020
Is a switch to a different electronic health record associated with a change in patient satisfaction?
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Beyond the 'Go-Live': why context matters in EHR implementations.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Impact of Electronic Health Services on Patient Satisfaction in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- A cross-sectional study on the relationship between length of stay and patient satisfaction based on the SERVQUAL model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Understanding patients' experiences during transitions from one electronic health record to another: A scoping review.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Eye Gaze Dynamics During Physician-Patient-Computer Interaction in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Systematic Analysis.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Understanding Patients' Preferences and Experiences During an Electronic Health Record Transition.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Applying requisite imagination to safeguard electronic health record transitions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Impact of Web-Based Self-Scheduling on Finalization of Well-Child Appointments in a Primary Care Setting: Retrospective Comparison Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Disrupted and Restored Patient Experience With Transition to New Electronic Health Record System.Journal of patient experience · 2021Article
- Transitions from One Electronic Health Record to Another: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Recommendations.Applied clinical informatics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFinancial impacts associated with a switch to a different electronic health record (EHR) have been documented. Less attention has been focused on the patient response to an EHR switch. The Mayo Clinic was involved in an EHR switch that occurred at 6 different locations and with 4 different "go-live" dates. We sought to understand the relationship between patient satisfaction and the transition to a new EHR. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe used patient satisfaction data collected by Press Ganey from July 2016 through December 2019. Our patient satisfaction measure was the percent of patients responding "very good" (top box) to survey questions. Twenty-four survey questions were summarized by Press Ganey into 6 patient satisfaction domains. Piecewise linear regression was used to model patient satisfaction before and after the EHR switch dates.
resultsSignificant drops in patient satisfaction were associated with the EHR switch. Patient satisfaction with access (ease of getting clinic on phone, ease of scheduling appointments, etc.) was most affected (range of 6 sites absolute decline: -3.4% to -8.8%; all significant at 99% confidence interval). Satisfaction with providers was least affected (range of 6 sites absolute decline: -0.5% to -2.8%; 4 of 6 sites significant at 99% confidence interval). After 9-15 months, patient satisfaction with access climbed back to pre-EHR switch levels.
conclusionsPatient satisfaction in several patient experience domains dropped significantly and stayed lower than pre-"go-live" for several months after a switch in EHR. Satisfaction with providers declined less than satisfaction with access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.