Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357195›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

"It made me more confident that I have it under control": Patient and provider perspectives on moving to a two-drug ART regimen in the United States and Spain.

Wendy Davis, Andrea Mantsios, Tahilin Karver, Miranda Murray, Yogesh Punekar, Douglas Ward, U Fritz Bredeek, Santiago Moreno, Dolores Merino, Hernando Knobel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Wendy DavisCenter on Health, Risk and Society, American University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4521-0688
Andrea MantsiosCenter on Health, Risk and Society, American University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Tahilin KarverCenter on Health, Risk and Society, American University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Miranda MurrayCenter on Health, Risk and Society, American University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Yogesh PunekarViiV Healthcare, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Douglas WardDupont Circle Physicians Group, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
U Fritz BredeekMetropolis Medical Group, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Santiago MorenoHospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Dolores MerinoHospital Infanta Elena, Huelva, Spain.
Hernando KnobelHospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio CampisHospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Deanna KerriganCenter on Health, Risk and Society, American University, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
American University · USHospital Del Mar · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Leonor · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Universitario Son Espases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo-drug regimens (2DR) to treat HIV infection have the potential to reduce long-term toxicity and increase therapeutic options for people living with HIV (PLHIV). Prior phase III trials, SWORD-1 and SWORD-2, as well as GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2, have demonstrated that a dolutegravir-based 2DR is as effective as three- or four-drug regimens among virologically suppressed patients. Limited information exists, however, on patient and provider experiences with 2DR to inform roll-out and integration into routine clinical care.

methodsWe conducted 39 in-depth interviews with PLHIV currently on 2DR in the context of routine care and 8 of their clinical care providers in the United States (U.S.) and Spain. Participants included 33 male and 6 female PLHIV and 8 providers. Interview topics explored perceptions of and experiences with 2DR compared to prior anti-retroviral regimens (ARVs), side effects, patient satisfaction, and clinical performance. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using thematic content analysis.

resultsParticipants viewed 2DR as a significant and positive advance, in terms of its ability to effectively treat HIV with reduced toxicity and essentially no reported side effects. Patients noted the central role providers played in the decision to switch to a 2DR regimen and, among U.S. participants, the importance of insurance coverage making this preferred option feasible. Patients and providers agreed that a 2DR regimen would be appropriate for any PLHIV regardless of whether they were treatment naïve or had significant experience with ARVs.

conclusionsParticipants' experiences with a 2DR regimen were positive with no participants, reporting side effects and all reporting continued viral suppression. Providers valued the reduced toxicity offered by 2DR and served as the primary gateway to a transition to 2DR for patients in both settings. This study provides a foundation for further research on the transition to 2DR regimens in other populations and contexts including low- and middle-income settings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-HIV AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingDrug CostsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient PreferenceSpainAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID32357195
PMCPMC7194407
OpenAlexW3022288594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.