ArticlePloS one2020
Resin acids as inducible chemical defences of pine seedlings against chewing insects.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resin-based response of Pinus pinaster and P. radiata during infection by Fusarium circinatum.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Resin defense in Pinus-Fusarium circinatum interactions: an evolutionary paradox.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- Abietane-Type Diterpenoids from the Resin ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A venom fraction from the Philippine tarantula (The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Implications of Breeding for Growth on Drought Tolerance in Scots Pine (Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Decoding the chemical language ofmSystems · 2024Article
- Biomolecular characterization of 3500-year-old ancient Egyptian mummification balms from the Valley of the Kings.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Pre-symbiotic response of the compatible host spruce and low-compatibility host pine to the ectomycorrhizal fungusFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Rosin fromFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Diterpene Resin Acids and Olefins in Calabrian Pine (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparing Exogenous Methods to Induce Plant-Resistance Against a Bark-Feeding Insect.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inducibility of defences in response to biotic stimuli is considered an important trait in plant resistance. In conifers, previous research has mostly focused on the inducibility of the volatile fraction of the oleoresin (mono- and sesquiterpenes), leaving the inducibility of the non-volatile resin acids largely unexplored, particularly in response to real herbivory. Here we investigated the differences in the inducibility of resin acids in two pine species, one native from Europe (Pinus pinaster Ait.) and another from North America (Pinus radiata D. Don), in response to wounding by two European insects: a bark chewer, the pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.), and a defoliator, the pine processionary caterpillar (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.). We quantified the constitutive (control) and induced concentrations of resin acids in the stem and needles of both pine species by gas chromatography techniques. Both pine species strongly increased the concentration of resin acids in the stem after pine weevil feeding, although the response was greater in P. pinaster than in P. radiata. However, systemic defensive responses in the needles were negligible in both pine species after pine weevil feeding in the stem. On the other hand, P. radiata locally reduced the resin acid concentration in the needles after pine caterpillar feeding, whereas in P. pinaster resin acid concentration was apparently unaffected. Nevertheless, systemic induction of resin acids was only observed in the stem of P. pinaster in response to pine caterpillar feeding. In summary, pine induced responses were found highly compartmentalized, and specific to herbivore identity. Particularly, plant defence suppression mechanisms by the pine caterpillar, and ontogenetic factors might be potentially affecting the induced response of resin acids in both pine species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.