Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357193›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Resin acids as inducible chemical defences of pine seedlings against chewing insects.

Xosé López-Goldar, Lina Lundborg, Anna Karin Borg-Karlson, Rafael Zas, Luis Sampedro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Abietane-Type Diterpenoids from the Resin ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. A venom fraction from the Philippine tarantula (The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rosin fromFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Xosé López-GoldarDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2049-7758
Lina LundborgDepartment of Chemistry, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna Karin Borg-KarlsonDepartment of Chemistry, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Rafael ZasMisión Biológica de Galicia (MBG-CSIC), Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain.
Luis SampedroMisión Biológica de Galicia (MBG-CSIC), Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3921-2575
KTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEMisión Biológica de Galicia · ESCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inducibility of defences in response to biotic stimuli is considered an important trait in plant resistance. In conifers, previous research has mostly focused on the inducibility of the volatile fraction of the oleoresin (mono- and sesquiterpenes), leaving the inducibility of the non-volatile resin acids largely unexplored, particularly in response to real herbivory. Here we investigated the differences in the inducibility of resin acids in two pine species, one native from Europe (Pinus pinaster Ait.) and another from North America (Pinus radiata D. Don), in response to wounding by two European insects: a bark chewer, the pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.), and a defoliator, the pine processionary caterpillar (Thaumetopoea pityocampa Schiff.). We quantified the constitutive (control) and induced concentrations of resin acids in the stem and needles of both pine species by gas chromatography techniques. Both pine species strongly increased the concentration of resin acids in the stem after pine weevil feeding, although the response was greater in P. pinaster than in P. radiata. However, systemic defensive responses in the needles were negligible in both pine species after pine weevil feeding in the stem. On the other hand, P. radiata locally reduced the resin acid concentration in the needles after pine caterpillar feeding, whereas in P. pinaster resin acid concentration was apparently unaffected. Nevertheless, systemic induction of resin acids was only observed in the stem of P. pinaster in response to pine caterpillar feeding. In summary, pine induced responses were found highly compartmentalized, and specific to herbivore identity. Particularly, plant defence suppression mechanisms by the pine caterpillar, and ontogenetic factors might be potentially affecting the induced response of resin acids in both pine species.

Indexed as

HerbivoryAcidsAnimalsMothsPinusResins, PlantSeedlingsWeevilsAcidsResins, Plant

Identifiers

PMID32357193
PMCPMC7194405
OpenAlexW3023987421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.