Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357172›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Logicome Profiler: Exhaustive detection of statistically significant logic relationships from comparative omics data.

Tsukasa Fukunaga, Wataru Iwasaki

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tsukasa FukunagaDepartment of Computer Science, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4442-6049
Wataru IwasakiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Logic relationship analysis is a data mining method that comprehensively detects item triplets that satisfy logic relationships from a binary matrix dataset, such as an ortholog table in comparative genomics. Thanks to recent technological advancements, many binary matrix datasets are now being produced in genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, metagenomics, and many other fields for comparative purposes. However, regardless of presumed interpretability and importance of logic relationships, existing data mining methods are not based on the framework of statistical hypothesis testing. That means, the type-1 and type-2 error rates are neither controlled nor estimated. Here, we developed Logicome Profiler, which exhaustively detects statistically significant triplet logic relationships from a binary matrix dataset (Logicome means ome of logics). To test all item triplets in a dataset while avoiding false positives, Logicome Profiler adjusts a significance level by the Bonferroni or Benjamini-Yekutieli method for the multiple testing correction. Its application to an ocean metagenomic dataset showed that Logicome Profiler can effectively detect statistically significant triplet logic relationships among environmental microbes and genes, which include those among urea transporter, urease, and photosynthesis-related genes. Beyond omics data analysis, Logicome Profiler is applicable to various binary matrix datasets in general for finding significant triplet logic relationships. The source code is available at https://github.com/fukunagatsu/LogicomeProfiler.

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicAlgorithmsData MiningLogicModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID32357172
PMCPMC7194410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.