Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32357171›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Genotyping by multiplexed sequencing (GMS): A customizable platform for genomic selection.

Travis M Ruff, Elliott J Marston, Jonathan D Eagle, Sajal R Sthapit, Marcus A Hooker, Daniel Z Skinner, Deven R See

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Travis M RuffDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3274-2346
Elliott J MarstonDepartment of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Jonathan D EagleDepartment of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Sajal R SthapitDepartment of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4759-8639
Marcus A HookerDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Daniel Z SkinnerDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Deven R SeeUSDA-ARS Wheat Health, Genetics and Quality Research Unit, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.
Washington State University · USQuality Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As genotyping technologies continue to evolve, so have their throughput and multiplexing capabilities. In this study, we demonstrate a new PCR-based genotyping technology that multiplexes thousands of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers with high-throughput capabilities in a simple protocol using a two-step PCR approach. The bioinformatic pipeline is user friendly and yields results that are intuitive to interpret. This method was tested on two recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations that had previous genotyping data from the Illumina Infinium assay for Triticum aestivum L. and the two data sets were found to be 100% in agreement. The genotyping by multiplexed sequencing (GMS) protocol multiplexes 1,656 wheat SNP markers, 207 syntenic barley SNP markers, and 49 known informative markers, which generate a possible 2,433 data points (including homoeoalleles and paralogs). This genotyping approach has the flexibility of being sequenced on either the Ion Torrent or Illumina next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms. Products are the result of direct sequencing and are therefore more reliable than scatter plot analysis which is the output of other genotyping methods such as the Illumina Infinium assay, komeptitive allele specific PCR and other like technologies.

Indexed as

GenomicsAllelesComputational BiologyGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTriticum

Identifiers

PMID32357171
PMCPMC7194356
OpenAlexW3023202426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.