ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2020
Vegetation type determines spore deposition within a forest-agricultural mosaic landscape.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Rainfall on Aquatic and Terrestrial Species Monitoring Using Riverine Environmental DNA.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Metabarcoding Reveals Rich and Diverse Aeromycobiota in Protected Oak Forests.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Diversity of myxomycetes on twig litter from various canopy trees in a mid-temperate natural forest in western Japan.Mycoscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Sequencing airborne DNA to monitor crop pathogens and pests.iScience · 2025Article
- Temporal dynamics of airborne fungi in Swedish forest nurseries.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Closing the gap: examining the impact of source habitat proximity on plant and soil microbial communities in post-mining spoil heap succession.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Metagenomics reveals effects of fluctuating water conditions on functional pathways in plant litter microbial community.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Research progress and management strategies of fungal diseases inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Host genotype interacts with aerial spore communities and influences the needle mycobiome of Norway spruce.Environmental microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting fungal community assembly is partly limited by our understanding of the factors driving the composition of deposited spores. We studied the relative contribution of vegetation, geographical distance, seasonality and weather to fungal spore deposition across three vegetation types. Active and passive spore traps were established in agricultural fields, deciduous forests and coniferous forests across a geographic gradient of ∼600 km. Active traps captured the spore community suspended in air, reflecting the potential deposition, whereas passive traps reflected realized deposition. Fungal species were identified by metabarcoding of the ITS2 region. The composition of spore communities captured by passive traps differed more between vegetation types than across regions separated by >100 km, indicating that vegetation type was the strongest driver of composition of deposited spores. By contrast, vegetation contributed less to potential deposition, which followed a seasonal pattern. Within the same site, the spore communities captured by active traps differed from those captured by passive traps. Realized deposition tended to be dominated by spores of species related to vegetation. Temperature was negatively correlated with the fungal species richness of both potential and realized deposition. Our results indicate that vegetation may be able to maintain similar fungal communities across distances, and likely be the driving factor of fungal spore deposition at landscape level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.