Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32356886›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Phenotypic Variability Among Patients With D4Z4 Reduced Allele Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy.

Lucia Ruggiero, Fabiano Mele, Fiore Manganelli, Dario Bruzzese, Giulia Ricci, Liliana Vercelli, Monica Govi, Antonio Vallarola, Silvia Tripodi, Luisa Villa and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Describing phenotypes in FSHD: an update of the comprehensive clinical evaluation form.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Deciphering Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy in the clinical trials era: where are we now?Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2025
    Review
  18. AChR-seropositive myasthenia gravis in muscular dystrophy: diagnostic pitfalls and clinical management challenges.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucia RuggieroDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive, and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Fabiano MeleDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Fiore ManganelliDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive, and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Dario BruzzeseDepartment of Preventive Medical Sciences, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Giulia RicciDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Liliana VercelliCenter for Neuromuscular Diseases, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Monica GoviDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Antonio VallarolaDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Silvia TripodiDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Luisa VillaNeuromuscular Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Antonio Di MuzioCenter for Neuromuscular Disease, Center for Excellence on Aging, Gabrile D'Annunzio University Foundation, Chieti, Italy.
Marina ScarlatoNeuromuscular Repair Unit, Inspe and Division of Neuroscience, IRCSS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta BucciDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni AntoniniDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health, and Sensory Organs, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo MaggiIRCCS Foundation, C. Besta Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy.
Carmelo RodolicoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giuliano TomelleriDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Massimiliano FilostoNeurology Clinic, Spedali Civili Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Stefano PrevitaliNeuromuscular Repair Unit, Inspe and Division of Neuroscience, IRCSS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Corrado AngeliniIRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italy.
Angela BerardinelliChild Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, IRCCS, Casimiro Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Elena PegoraroDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Maurizio MoggioNeuromuscular Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Dino Ferrari Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Tiziana MonginiCenter for Neuromuscular Diseases, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Gabriele SicilianoNeurological Clinic, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Lucio SantoroDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive, and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Rossella TuplerDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Turin · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITFondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino · ITIRCCS San Camillo Hospital · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Messina · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is considered an autosomal dominant disorder, associated with the deletion of tandemly arrayed D4Z4 repetitive elements. The extensive use of molecular analysis of the D4Z4 locus for FSHD diagnosis has revealed wide clinical variability, suggesting that subgroups of patients exist among carriers of the D4Z4 reduced allele (DRA). Objective: To investigate the clinical expression of FSHD in the genetic subgroup of carriers of a DRA with 7 to 8 repeat units (RUs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cross-sectional study included 422 carriers of DRA with 7 to 8 RUs (187 unrelated probands and 235 relatives) from a consecutive sample of 280 probands and 306 relatives from the Italian National Registry for FSHD collected between 2008 and 2016. Participants were evaluated by the Italian Clinical Network for FSHD, and all clinical and molecular data were collected in the Italian National Registry for FSHD database. Data analysis was conducted from January 2017 to June 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The phenotypic classification of probands and relatives was obtained by applying the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form which classifies patients in the 4 following categories: (1) participants presenting facial and scapular girdle muscle weakness typical of FSHD (category A, subcategories A1-A3), (2) participants with muscle weakness limited to scapular girdle or facial muscles (category B, subcategories B1 and B2), (3) asymptomatic or healthy participants (category C, subcategories C1 and C2), and (4) participants with myopathic phenotypes presenting clinical features not consistent with FSHD canonical phenotype (category D, subcategories D1 and D2). Results: A total of 187 probands (mean [SD] age at last neurological examination, 53.5 [15.2] years; 103 [55.1%] men) and 235 relatives (mean [SD] age at last neurologic examination, 45.1 [17.0] years; 104 [44.7%] men) with a DRA with 7 to 8 RUs and a molecular diagnosis of FSHD were evaluated. Of 187 probands, 99 (52.9%; 95% CI, 45.7%-60.1%) displayed the classic FSHD phenotype, whereas 86 (47.1%; 95% CI, 39.8%-54.3%) presented incomplete or atypical phenotypes. Of 235 carrier relatives from 106 unrelated families, 124 (52.8%; 95% CI, 46.4%-59.7%) had no motor impairment, whereas a small number (38 [16.2%; 95% CI, 9.8%-23.1%]) displayed the classic FSHD phenotype, and 73 (31.0%; 95% CI, 24.7%-38.0%) presented with incomplete or atypical phenotypes. In 37 of 106 families (34.9%; 95% CI, 25.9%-44.8%), the proband was the only participant presenting with a myopathic phenotype, while only 20 families (18.9%; 95% CI, 11.9%-27.6%) had a member with autosomal dominant FSHD. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found large phenotypic variability associated with individuals carrying a DRA with 7 to 8 RUs, in contrast to the indication that a positive molecular test is the only determining aspect for FSHD diagnosis. These findings suggest that carriers of a DRA with 7 to 8 RUs constitute a genetic subgroup different from classic FSHD. Based on these results, it is recommended that clinicians use the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form for clinical classification and, whenever possible, study the extended family to provide the most adequate clinical management and genetic counseling.

Indexed as

AdultAllelesBiological Variation, PopulationCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedMuscular Dystrophy, FacioscapulohumeralPedigreeRegistriesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID32356886
PMCPMC7195625
OpenAlexW3021417600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.