ArticleJAMA network open2020
Phenotypic Variability Among Patients With D4Z4 Reduced Allele Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sphingolipid Remodeling and Extracellular Vesicle Signatures Reflect Disease Severity in Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy Driven by Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nanopore Ultra-Long Sequencing for FSHD: From Molecular Diagnosis to Preimplantation Genetic Testing.Genes · 2026Review
- The Russian FSHD registry: a first look at the cohort.Human genetics · 2026Article
- Complete genetic and epigenetic architecture of D4Z4 macrosatellites in FSHD, BAMS, and reference cohorts with D4Z4End2End.Genome research · 2026Article
- Rethinking genomics of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy in the telomere-to-telomere era: pitfalls in the hidden landscape of D4Z4 repeats.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Observational
- Co-Occurrence of Myasthenia Gravis and Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: A Case Series and Review of Literature.European journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Camptocormia as a Phenotypic Variant of FSHD in the Elderly: Clinical, Genetic, and Imaging Features.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Association of Diaphragm Involvement Assessed by Ultrasound With Disease Severity in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2025Observational
- Diversity challenges and reconciles genetics in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.Journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Prevalence and predictors of uncommon features in FSHD1 patients: insights from the French FSHD registry.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Describing phenotypes in FSHD: an update of the comprehensive clinical evaluation form.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Double trouble: a comprehensive study into unrelated genetic comorbidities in adult patients with Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type I.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Article
- Estrogen rescues muscle regeneration impaired by DUX4 in a humanized xenograft mouse model.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Nucleolar FRG2 lncRNAs inhibit rRNA transcription and cytoplasmic translation, linking FSHD to dysregulation of muscle-specific protein synthesis.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Posttranscriptional RNA stabilization of telomeric RNAs FRG2, DBE-T, D4Z4 at human 4q35 in response to genotoxic stress and D4Z4 macrosatellite repeat length.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Deciphering Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy in the clinical trials era: where are we now?Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2025Review
- AChR-seropositive myasthenia gravis in muscular dystrophy: diagnostic pitfalls and clinical management challenges.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- Deciphering the Complexity of FSHD: A Multimodal Approach as a Model for Rare Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- French National Protocol for diagnosis and care of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).Journal of neurology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
27 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is considered an autosomal dominant disorder, associated with the deletion of tandemly arrayed D4Z4 repetitive elements. The extensive use of molecular analysis of the D4Z4 locus for FSHD diagnosis has revealed wide clinical variability, suggesting that subgroups of patients exist among carriers of the D4Z4 reduced allele (DRA). Objective: To investigate the clinical expression of FSHD in the genetic subgroup of carriers of a DRA with 7 to 8 repeat units (RUs). Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cross-sectional study included 422 carriers of DRA with 7 to 8 RUs (187 unrelated probands and 235 relatives) from a consecutive sample of 280 probands and 306 relatives from the Italian National Registry for FSHD collected between 2008 and 2016. Participants were evaluated by the Italian Clinical Network for FSHD, and all clinical and molecular data were collected in the Italian National Registry for FSHD database. Data analysis was conducted from January 2017 to June 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The phenotypic classification of probands and relatives was obtained by applying the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form which classifies patients in the 4 following categories: (1) participants presenting facial and scapular girdle muscle weakness typical of FSHD (category A, subcategories A1-A3), (2) participants with muscle weakness limited to scapular girdle or facial muscles (category B, subcategories B1 and B2), (3) asymptomatic or healthy participants (category C, subcategories C1 and C2), and (4) participants with myopathic phenotypes presenting clinical features not consistent with FSHD canonical phenotype (category D, subcategories D1 and D2). Results: A total of 187 probands (mean [SD] age at last neurological examination, 53.5 [15.2] years; 103 [55.1%] men) and 235 relatives (mean [SD] age at last neurologic examination, 45.1 [17.0] years; 104 [44.7%] men) with a DRA with 7 to 8 RUs and a molecular diagnosis of FSHD were evaluated. Of 187 probands, 99 (52.9%; 95% CI, 45.7%-60.1%) displayed the classic FSHD phenotype, whereas 86 (47.1%; 95% CI, 39.8%-54.3%) presented incomplete or atypical phenotypes. Of 235 carrier relatives from 106 unrelated families, 124 (52.8%; 95% CI, 46.4%-59.7%) had no motor impairment, whereas a small number (38 [16.2%; 95% CI, 9.8%-23.1%]) displayed the classic FSHD phenotype, and 73 (31.0%; 95% CI, 24.7%-38.0%) presented with incomplete or atypical phenotypes. In 37 of 106 families (34.9%; 95% CI, 25.9%-44.8%), the proband was the only participant presenting with a myopathic phenotype, while only 20 families (18.9%; 95% CI, 11.9%-27.6%) had a member with autosomal dominant FSHD. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found large phenotypic variability associated with individuals carrying a DRA with 7 to 8 RUs, in contrast to the indication that a positive molecular test is the only determining aspect for FSHD diagnosis. These findings suggest that carriers of a DRA with 7 to 8 RUs constitute a genetic subgroup different from classic FSHD. Based on these results, it is recommended that clinicians use the Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Form for clinical classification and, whenever possible, study the extended family to provide the most adequate clinical management and genetic counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.