Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32356883›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Assessment of Hospital Readmissions From the Emergency Department After Implementation of Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.

Charleen Hsuan, Brendan G Carr, Renee Y Hsia, Geoffrey J Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Electronic connectivity between hospital pairs: impact on emergency department-related utilization.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Electronic connectivity between hospital pairs: impact on emergency department-related utilization.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charleen HsuanDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Brendan G CarrDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Renee Y HsiaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Geoffrey J HoffmanDepartment of Systems, Populations and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Brian Thiede · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
The Impact of Cardiac Care Regionalization on Access, Treatment, and OutcomesR01HL134182 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Renee Yuen-Jan Hsia, YU-CHU SHEN · 2016 to 2026
$4.1M
A POPULATION BASED APPROACH TO IMPROVE OUTCOMES AFTER OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARRESTR01HL141841 · NHLBI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI CARR, BRENDAN G · 2018 to 2022
$3.8M
Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Lab Openings and Closures on Patients, Hospitals, and CommunitiesR01HL114822 · NHLBI · NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH · PI HSIA, RENEE YUEN-JAN, SHEN, YU-CHU · 2012 to 2020
$2.8M
The geography of acute careR01HS023614 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CARR, BRENDAN G · 2014 to 2014
$1.2M
An Examination of How an Avoided Readmission Affects Hospitals FinanciallyR03HS025838 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HOFFMAN, GEOFFREY JONATHAN · 2018 to 2019
$99k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS023614AHRQ HHS R03 HS025838NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL114822NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL134182NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141841NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) is associated with reduced readmission rates, but it is unknown how this decrease occurred. Objective: To examine whether the HRRP was associated with changes in the probability of readmission at emergency department (ED) visits after hospital discharge (ED revisits) overall and depending on whether admission is typically indicated for the patient's condition at the ED revisit. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used hospital and ED discharge data from California, Florida, and New York from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. A difference-in-differences analysis examined change in readmission probability at ED revisits for recently discharged patients; ED revisits with clinical presentations for which admission is typically indicated vs those for which admission is more variable (ie, discretionary) were examined separately. Inclusion criteria were Medicare patients 65 years and older who revisited an ED within 30 days of inpatient discharge. Data were analyzed from December 18, 2018, to September 11, 2019. Exposures: Before and after HRRP implementation among patients initially hospitalized for targeted vs nontargeted conditions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-day unplanned hospital readmissions at the ED revisit. Results: A total of 9 914 068 index hospitalizations were identified in California, Florida, and New York from 2010 to 2014. Of 2 052 096 discharges in 2010, 1 168 126 (56.9%) discharges were women and 566 957 discharges (27.6%) were among patients older than 85 years. Among 1 421 407 patients with an unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge, 1 266 107 patients (89.1%) were admitted through the ED. A total of 1 906 498 ED revisits were identified. After adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics from the index hospitalization, HRRP implementation was associated with fewer readmissions from the ED, with a difference-in-difference estimate of -0.9 (95% CI, -1.4 to -0.4) percentage points (P < .001), or a 1.4% relative decrease from the 65.8% pre-HRRP readmission rates. Implementation of the HRRP was associated with fewer readmissions at the ED revisit involving clinical presentations for which admission is typically indicated (difference-in-differences estimate, -1.1 [95% CI, -1.6 to -0.6] percentage points; P < .001), or a 1.2% relative decrease from the 93.6% pre-HRRP rate. These results appear to be associated with patients presenting at the ED revisit with congestive heart failure (difference-in-difference estimate, -1.2 [95% CI, -2.0 to -0.4] percentage points; P = .003). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that implementation of the HRRP was associated with a lower likelihood of readmission for recently discharged patients presenting to the ED, specifically for congestive heart failure. This highlights the critical role of the ED in readmission reduction under the HRRP and suggests that patient outcomes after HRRP implementation should be further studied.

Indexed as

Health Plan ImplementationMedicareAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMalePatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32356883
PMCPMC7195622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.