Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32356773›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2020

Testing Usability and Feasibility of a Mobile Educator Tool for Pediatric Diabetes Self-Management: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Marisa Otis, Jack Zhu, Suleiman N Mustafa-Kutana, Angelina V Bernier, Julio Ma Shum, Arlette A Soros Dupre, Monica L Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marisa OtisDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9911-2736
Jack ZhuDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8664-826X
Suleiman N Mustafa-KutanaDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9309-2685
Angelina V BernierDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1300-8151
Julio Ma ShumDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8948-1805
Arlette A Soros DupreDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2127-6340
Monica L WangDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7019-5072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile interventions hold promise as an intervention modality to engage children in improving diabetes self-management education, attitudes, and behaviors.

objectiveThis pilot study aimed to explore the usability, acceptability, and feasibility of delivering a mobile diabetes educational tool to parent-child pairs in a clinical setting.

methodsThis mixed methods pilot study comprised two concurrent phases with differing study participants. Phase 1 used user testing interviews to collect qualitative data on the usability and acceptability of the tool. Phase 2 used a single-arm pre- and poststudy design to quantitatively evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of the intervention. Study participants (English-speaking families with youth aged 5-14 years with insulin-dependent diabetes) were recruited from an urban hospital in Massachusetts, United States. In phase 1, parent-child pairs were invited to complete the intervention together and participate in 90-min user testing interviews assessing the tool's usability and acceptability. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a directed content analysis approach. In phase 2, parent-child pairs were invited to complete the intervention together in the clinical setting. Measures included parental and child knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to diabetes management (self-report surveys) and child hemoglobin A1c levels (medical record extractions); data were collected at baseline and 1-month follow-up. Pre- and postoutcomes were compared using paired t tests and the Fisher exact test.

resultsA total of 11 parent-child pairs (N=22) participated in phase 1 of the study, and 10 parent-child pairs (N=20) participated in phase 2 of the study. Participants viewed the mobile educational tool as acceptable (high engagement and satisfaction with the layout, activities, and videos) and identified the areas of improvement for tool usability (duration, directions, and animation).

conclusionsThe findings from this pilot study suggest that the mobile educational tool is an informative, engaging, and feasible way to deliver diabetes self-management education to parents and children in an urban hospital setting. Data will inform future iterations of this mobile diabetes educational intervention to improve usability and test intervention efficacy.

Indexed as

child healthdiabetes mellitushealth educationmHealthmobile healthself-management

Identifiers

PMID32356773
PMCPMC7229529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.