ReviewUpsala journal of medical sciences2020
Fertility preservation for young adults, adolescents, and children with cancer.
Review in Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Fertility management and outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy: an international survey from the Cellular Therapy and Immunobiology working party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Microfluidics for in vitro fertilization: from science to clinical validation.Human reproduction update · 2026Review
- The era of increasing cancer survivorship: Trends in fertility preservation, medico-legal implications, and ethical challenges.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- The complexity and challenges of fertility preservation in women with cervix cancer-A prospective cohort study reporting on reproductive outcome and overall survival.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Observational
- Fertility preservation methods in children with the risk of female hypogonadism - possibilities and limitations.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2025Review
- Experiencing fertility preservation in adolescence - a qualitative interview study indicating gender disparities in AYAs diagnosed with cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Current Status of Fertility Preservation in Pediatric Oncology Patients.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Mesenchymal stem cells promote ovarian reconstruction in mice.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Article
- Controlled ovarian stimulation in cancer patients under 18 years old; a case series.Journal of ovarian research · 2024Article
- Parenthood in a Swedish prospective cohort of 1,378 adolescents and young adults banking semen for fertility preservation at time of cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Observational
- Clinical and self-reported markers of reproductive function in female survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- Understanding Fertility Attitudes and Outcomes Among Survivors of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancers in a Low-Resource Setting: A Registry-Based Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview Survey.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2023Article
- The Late Effects of Cancer Treatment on Female Fertility and the Current Status of Fertility Preservation-A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Hot Topics on Fertility Preservation for Women and Girls-Current Research, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Possibilities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- A Prospective Study on Fertility Preservation in Prepubertal and Adolescent Girls Undergoing Hematological Stem Cell Transplantation.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Are we looking under the lamp although we know the lost key is somewhere else? Or is it just about the egg?Upsala journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Options for fertility preservation (FP) through cryopreservation methods are currently available for young adults, adolescents, and children. Guidelines for FP have been provided by international clinical societies, and emergency procedures aimed at FP have been implemented into clinical practice worldwide. In this article, we review the current data on clinical standards of emergency FP in patients who are facing gonadotoxic effects of cancer treatment, and we also describe the methods that are still under development, usually denoted as experimental. In Sweden, programmes for FP have been established at large university hospitals, thus covering the whole country. The Swedish publicly financed health care covers both assisted reproduction for treatment of infertility and the cryopreservation of gametes or gonadal tissue when there is a medical indication, such as the risk to become infertile due to oncologic treatment; hence the access to FP is ensured for the whole population. At our centre at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, methods for FP have been offered since 1988. In this article, we also review the oncologic indications for FP in our patient cohort of >3000 individuals during the period 1988-2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.